“A gutting of the Voting Rights Act”
Deadline: White House
Nicolle Wallace, MS NOW
4.5 • 6.4K Ratings
🗓️ 29 April 2026
⏱️ 42 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | The Voting Rights Act, Sections 2, 4, 5 were the cornerstones of providing political power to African Americans |
| 0:15.0 | that then led to a whole range of other steps to make America more just and more equal. It was the cornerstone |
| 0:28.0 | and the culmination of years of struggle, blood, sweat, tears, in some cases, deaths. |
| 0:40.6 | I might not be here as president had it not been for those who courageously helped to pass the Voting Rights Act. |
| 0:51.8 | I might not be here as president. Wow. Hi again, everyone. It's five o'clock in New York. That was |
| 0:58.0 | president, former president, Barack Obama back in 2013, reacting then in real time to the Supreme Court's |
| 1:04.9 | gutting of the Voting Rights Act. Today, the court went further than they did that day. In a likely blow to Democrats' representation |
| 1:12.8 | in Congress and in a complete and utter perversion of the original purpose of the Voting Rights Act, |
| 1:18.9 | the nation's highest court told states that they can almost never consider race when drawing |
| 1:24.3 | congressional maps to comply with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act and striking down |
| 1:29.1 | Louisiana's congressional maps due to a majority black district. The decision was 6'3 along |
| 1:35.9 | ideological lines with all three liberal justices dissenting. Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the |
| 1:42.0 | majority, said this, quote, compliance with Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act could not justify the state's use of race-based redistricting here. |
| 1:50.7 | The state's attempt to satisfy the district court's ruling, although understandable, was an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. |
| 1:57.7 | While the court technically stopped short of overturning this key provision entirely |
| 2:02.9 | in a scathing dissent, Justice Elena Kagan called it demolished and said that today's |
| 2:08.9 | majority opinion amounts to, quote, the largest reduction to minority representation since the end of |
| 2:16.1 | reconstruction. |
| 2:18.8 | That's sinking. |
| 2:20.8 | Here's more from her dissent. |
| 2:26.2 | Quote, under the court's new view of Section 2, a state can without legal consequence systematically dilute minority citizens voting power. |
| 2:30.1 | Of course, the majority does not announce today's holding that way. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Nicolle Wallace, MS NOW, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Nicolle Wallace, MS NOW and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

