A court rules Trump has no presidential immunity
The News Agents - USA
Global
4.3 • 719 Ratings
🗓️ 6 February 2024
⏱️ 46 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
The unanimous decision by the court of appeal in Washington has declared that Donald Trump has no presidential immunity.
This means Special Counsel Jack Smith can now proceed apace with his indictment of Trump over attempted election interference.
What does this mean for Trump legally?
What will happen to the highly debated US border deal?
And later to hear from Ambassador John Bolton on whether military intervention by the US could make a Trump comeback more likely.
Editor: Gabriel Radus
Social Media Editor: Georgia Foxwell
Video Production: Rory Symon
The News Agents USA is brought to you by HSBC UK - https://www.hsbc.co.uk/
You can listen to this episode on Alexa - just say "Alexa, ask Global Player to play The News Agents USA".
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | The Newsagents USA podcast is brought to you by HSBC UK, opening up a world of opportunity. |
| 0:07.6 | We just finished recording the Newsagents USA when some pretty big breaking news happened. |
| 0:12.7 | And so we thought we should start by bringing you up to date on what this means. |
| 0:18.3 | It is a decision by the Appeals Court, a federal appeals court, which has stated |
| 0:22.6 | that Donald Trump cannot use presidential immunity as a shield against criminal charges over |
| 0:29.0 | alleged interference. And just to explain, it was a unanimous decision, it's a three-judge panel, |
| 0:35.1 | it can still be overturned by the Supreme Court, which could intervene |
| 0:41.2 | on Donald Trump's behalf, but there is a potential likelihood that they will let this pass |
| 0:49.9 | because the language the appeals court has used is so completely strident. It has made it so clear that it is |
| 0:58.9 | unacceptable for him to be given presidential immunity. It almost begs a question as what argument |
| 1:05.7 | they would use to overcome it. It is, just to clarify, a huge win for Jack Smith, who's the special prosecutor |
| 1:13.9 | in the election interference case. That court trial was meant to be happening at the beginning |
| 1:18.4 | of March. It then got delayed, pushed back whilst they were waiting for this. It could |
| 1:22.9 | still happen towards the end of March now, or maybe April. But in very, very forceful language, the appeals |
| 1:28.8 | court rejected the notion of blanket immunity. So this is quite a critical moment because on |
| 1:36.8 | Thursday of this week, we will be hearing what the Supreme Court rules over the Colorado |
| 1:43.6 | question. |
| 1:44.7 | This is whether the former president should be taken off the ballot because he engaged in |
| 1:52.5 | insurrection. |
| 1:54.1 | This was something that the Colorado Supreme Court decided. |
| 1:57.7 | That got sent up to the overall US Supreme Court. They will be deciding on that |
| 2:03.4 | question on Thursday. But right now, in this news, it's just reaching us, which we're going to |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Global, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Global and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

