[♪ OUTRO MUSIC PLAYING [♪

Let this moment radicalize you. We have focused on voting for Joe Biden. I don't care if you like him or not.

This is not over. You know, we win in November. I'm sorry, I tell you, you're not going back to brunch. We're not going back to brunch. That's not happening.

What is she talking about? Um, I didn't catch the brunch reference either. I don't know.

Was that straight out of Nancy? Was that code to answer Nancy Pelosi's? Good morning. Um, Sunday.

We're not going out to brunch. Then we know that the spies are the donkey goes to brunch at midnight, the crazy donkey.

Then they exchange the microphone. A couple of pieces of new information on the whole Supreme Court thing. But the biggest of the day is Mitt Romney saying I'm open to voting.

And it's basically a yes vote, which means it's going to happen. He also went on to say this about the whole Supreme Court thing.

I recognize that we, uh, we may have a court which has more of a conservative bent than it's had over the last few decades.

But my liberal friends have over many decades gotten very used to the idea of having a gay liberal court. And that's not written in the stars.

And I know a lot of people are saying, gosh, we don't want that change. I understand the energy associated with that perspective.

But it's also appropriate for nation, which is if you will center right to have a court which reflects a center right points of view, which again are not changing the law from what it states, but instead following the law and following the constitution.

The court throughout the 60s and 70s was wildly left. Nobody ever talks about that. He dropped a G bomb. I mean, you can tell he's passionate. He said, gosh, gosh, you dropped a G bomb there. So galley breaking Pat to me Republican Senator swing state Republican said he supports moving on the Trump Supreme Court nominee.

So any of the possible wobblers are on board now other than near two, Murkowski and Collins, but you don't need a ball. Um, you could lose three.

And they've only lost two and everybody else seems to be on board. So it's a done deal. All right. That that that that's all over, but the cry and or the cheering depending on which side you're on or the unspeakably savage inhumane hearings.

I don't think that's going to happen, but Senator Schumer just said if the Senate majority over the course of six years steals two Supreme court seats using completely contradictory, contradictory rationales, how could we expect to trust the other side again?

Steels is a heck of a word. Yeah, given the fact that not helpful. Both times it was constitutional. There wasn't anything illegal happening at all.

Um, yeah, well everybody's picking shoes on their narrative. The fact that Joe Biden was staunchly opposed to a last year, a final year Supreme Court appointment in 1992, then was staunchly for it in 2016.

And it's now staunchly against in 2020. Doesn't that tell you anything you need to know?

We had a great conversation with Adam White of the American Enterprise Institute. He was one of the smartest people in the Supreme Court in America. And you're going to hear everything you need to know about the Supreme Court, how it works packing the court, all that sort of stuff later this hour. So that's that's good.

Yes, good content right there.

Hey, speaking of the potentially brutal hearings, we posed the question women, what would you think? How would you react to Kamala Harris just savaging Amy Coney Barrett if indeed she is the, the nominee that whole because women dealing with women is is different than I thought it was as a young man. I've come to understand there are dynamics there.

...