#98 - Should We Genetically Modify Food?
Open to Debate
Open to Debate
4.6 • 2.2K Ratings
🗓️ 10 December 2014
⏱️ 52 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Thanks for listening to Intelligent Squared U.S. |
| 0:02.0 | Our friends at NPR Music are holding a contest to find the next great unknown musician or band. |
| 0:08.0 | Here's the deal. Record one original song, no covers, |
| 0:12.0 | post it to YouTube and enter at npr.org slash tiny desk contest by January 19, 2015. |
| 0:20.0 | The winner will be flown to Washington, D.C. to perform as part of the tiny desk concert series |
| 0:25.0 | and play a couch trip into Austin's showcase in March. |
| 0:28.0 | Enter at npr.org slash tiny desk contest. Good luck. |
| 0:32.0 | I'm John Donovan. This is Intelligent Squared U.S. |
| 0:40.0 | And nature has many unknowns, but one certainty is that tomatoes and fish do not have sex with each other. |
| 0:47.0 | They never have. And yet one of the most famous or some might say infamous feats of genetic engineering was the development of a tomato whose DNA was mingled with DNA from a fish |
| 0:57.0 | which gave it a longer life on the vine. And it worked. |
| 1:00.0 | Then there's corn where today some 90% of the corn grown in the United States has its DNA mixed with DNA that comes from a bacterium so that it will stand up better to pests. |
| 1:09.0 | And that works. And is this a good thing, this genetic engineering, that nature could never accomplish on its own? |
| 1:16.0 | Is it a safe thing? Is it necessary? Well, those questions sound like the makings of a debate. So let's have it. |
| 1:22.0 | Yes or no to this statement genetically modify food a debate from Intelligent Squared U.S. |
| 1:29.0 | I'm John Donovan. We are at the Kaufman Music Center in New York City. |
| 1:33.0 | We have four superbly qualified debaters, two against two who will argue for and against this motion. |
| 1:38.0 | As always our debate will go in three rounds. And then the live audience here in New York votes to choose the winner and only one side wins. |
| 1:48.0 | Our motion is genetically modified food. Let's meet the team first arguing for the motion. Please let's welcome Robert Frailey. |
| 1:54.0 | And Rob you are Executive Vice President Chief Technology Officer at Monsanto. You've worked there 30 years. |
| 2:05.0 | You are the winner of the World Food Prize Laureate. That's an award often described as the Nobel for food and agriculture. |
| 2:14.0 | And it's related to this debate because of your work on what exactly? Well thanks John. That was a award given along with two of my academic colleagues for basically developing the tools that allowed us to create the GMO crops. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Open to Debate, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Open to Debate and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

