meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Open to Debate

#95 - Mass Collection Of U.S. Phone Records Violates The Fourth Amendment

Open to Debate

Open to Debate

Education, News, Society & Culture

4.6 • 2.2K Ratings

🗓️ 14 October 2014

⏱️ 51 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Some say that the mass collection of U.S. phone records is a gross invasion of privacy. Others say that it is necessary to keep us safe. But what does the U.S. Constitution say? "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.” Is collection of phone records a “search” or “seizure"? If so, is it “unreasonable”? Does it require a particularized warrant and probable cause? These are among the most consequential—and controversial—constitutional questions of our time. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Thanks for listening to Intelligent Squared U.S. When does learning begin? Are we at the end of privacy?

0:06.5

And what does the road from curiosity to discovery look like? The Ted Radio Hour is a journey through fascinating ideas,

0:13.5

astonishing inventions, fresh approaches to old problems, and new ways to think and create.

0:19.5

Find the Ted Radio Hour on iTunes under podcasts.

0:24.0

A smart old guy once said, and I paraphrase, if you don't want your enemies knowing your secrets,

0:32.5

then don't share them with your friends. That was Benjamin Franklin, who obviously had a well-developed sense of privacy himself.

0:40.0

As did his friends, the framers of the Constitution, when they went on to add the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution,

0:46.0

and that is the one that bars the government from searching our houses and from going through our stuff without a good reason

0:52.0

and without a warrant. But none of those framer guys really foresaw this world of the Internet and mobile phones,

1:00.0

and the government's present practice of sweeping up huge amounts of data from both of these sources on us.

1:06.5

And the question is, does that violate the framers intent? What would Ben Franklin say about all of this?

1:12.5

Well, that sounds like the making of a debate, so let's have it. Yes or no to this statement.

1:17.5

Mass collection of US phone records violates the Fourth Amendment, a debate from intelligence-squared US.

1:24.0

I'm John Dunvenn, we are here at the National Constitution Center in Philadelphia.

1:28.5

We have four superbly qualified debaters, two against two, arguing four and against this motion.

1:35.5

Mass collection of US phone records violates the Fourth Amendment.

1:40.0

And here, to argue for the motion, let's first meet, debater number one, please welcome Alex Abdo.

1:45.0

And now it's just a little biography on you, you're a staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union.

1:53.0

You are involved in the ACLU's lawsuit against the NSA's phone record program.

1:59.0

In June of 2013, pertin to your case, it was revealed that Verizon was required to turn phone records over to the NSA.

2:10.0

And as it turns out, your outfit at the ACLU is a Verizon customer.

2:15.5

So my question is, does this now mean you all switch massively to AT&T or Sprint?

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Open to Debate, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Open to Debate and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.