Reconsidering the haves and the have-not offenses, that's what we're going to talk about today on stealing bananas.

I'm Ben Gretch. You can find my newsletter at Bencgretch.com. With me as always is Sean Siegel.

You can find all of his great work over at Rodevis. And Sean, after our show yesterday,

you and I spent like an hour talking about mobile quarterbacks. I think I wrote about over

at Stealing Signals this week and sort of the landscape of a lot of different offenses.

We didn't actually record that.

We joked after that we probably should have.

It would have been a good episode.

We don't always know that we're going to go for a full hour on these types of things.

But there have been some interesting developments, a lot of interesting developments across the NFL this year,

but particularly something I pointed out this

week or even last week is that it feels like a lot of these surprising offenses do have mobile

quarterbacks. They're using those mobile quarterbacks as weapons in the run game, whether that's

Atlanta or Chicago or New York, the Giants specifically.

And we're seeing a lot of the less mobile quarterbacks or the quarterbacks that have a lot of, you know, arm talent or traditional pocket passing skill that we would expect to

support multiple receivers.

We're seeing a lot of them struggle.

Their A-DOTs are falling.

We've talked about this.

Think about

Tom Brady or Aaron Rogers or Justin Herbert as guys that they've had some games where they've had

to throw underneath a lot and they're not supporting a bunch of receivers downfield. And then the

...