This is the most wonderful time of the year.

Oh, yeah, yice.

How's things there?

Pretty good.

All right, we have a fairly long episode, I think, so we should probably get this rolling.

And let me start by asking you a bit of a meta question.

Meta, meta, whatever.

I don't think anybody says Mata.

Okay.

A meta question.

Is it bad to do a show that's entirely follow-up?

And I'm not at all asking because this episode might go that way, wink-wink. But I was thinking about it earlier today. And when we have ATP episodes

that are nothing but follow-up, sometimes I'm like, man, maybe we should have like changed how we

handled that or abridged a lot of it. so it would go a little quicker or what have you.

But on the other side of the coin, if we're following up, we're following up because listeners or, you know, people in the community have told us things.

And so it's more of a two-way street when we do follow-up, right? And that's good, right?

I think that

this is a real gray area. And I have felt this way from previous episodes of my shows and from

previous episodes of ATP. It can, you can, there's a real fine line that's difficult. So you can

end up in a scenario where all you're doing is just correcting

and adding on from last week. Or you can do what I think we're doing today, which is taking

the previous discussion into a more in-depth discussion. So like we have a lot later on today

...