#736: Reflections on a Verdict

Knowledge Fight

Politics, News, Comedy

4.8 • 5.1K Ratings

🗓️ 15 October 2022

⏱️ 68 minutes

🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Today, Dan and Jordan sit down for a sneaky snake chat with plaintiff's attorney Mark Bankston, to get a handle on the news of Alex's recent almost $1 billion verdict in the CT case, and what the next steps are likely to be in the various litigations he's facing.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0	가는 ja Patties
0:03.4	Rhett of Dharma
0:06.6	Kull быoth
0:09.7	Rhett of Arrishna
0:11.4	a
0:13.3	pal
0:15.4	Ovastand
0:17.0	Esta
0:19.6	p
0:20.4	4
0:24.3	There's a
0:25.0	p
0:25.7	4
0:26.7	th
0:59.7	everybody has a good out there. This is Dan. Here's the situation. The other day in Jordan,
1:06.9	after the verdict came out on Thursday, we had the opportunity to sit down and chat with
1:12.9	the plaintiffs attorney from the Texas cases. Mark Bankston about the, you know, the goings-on,
1:20.9	the reflect a little bit on the case and what were the most likely next steps. And that is a
1:28.0	little bonus, boonus, boonus, boonus. That's what it is. It's a bonus little episode for this weekend
1:34.5	for you all to enjoy. Sneaky Snake and but here's the thing. Me and Jordan had me and me and me and
1:40.3	me and I'm pronouncing things weird all over the place. Me and Jordan had meant to record an intro
1:48.7	like this, what I'm what I'm doing here, but we forgot. Anyway, I just thought it would be weird
	...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Previous episode | Next episode

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Knowledge Fight, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Knowledge Fight and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.