4.8 • 1.1K Ratings
🗓️ 27 January 2023
⏱️ 29 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | The Economist, Heather Sarsons, doesn't usually think too much about medicine or health care. |
0:11.4 | When I started my PhD, I was pretty interested in looking at why we still see gender and race |
0:16.8 | inequality in labor markets. Heather is a professor at the University of British Columbia, |
0:21.8 | and most of the time, her work focuses on discrimination. A lot of the models in economics |
0:28.1 | focus on two types of discrimination, taste-based, which is the idea that people just may not like |
0:33.9 | other people from a certain group and then statistical discrimination. Statistical discrimination |
0:39.6 | can also be harmful, but in theory, it doesn't arise from prejudice or racial or gender bias. |
0:46.0 | Instead, it relies on obvious traits, like race or gender, to make generalizations about a person |
0:54.0 | If you take the example of, say, women studying math, if historically women are less likely to have |
1:00.1 | invested in maths and science skills, then employers knowing that might hold women to a higher standard, |
1:05.4 | and so a woman really has to send a strong signal that, I'm very good at math, I've really studied |
1:10.9 | this. But it can be exhausting to have to send a strong signal. At some point, it becomes |
1:16.8 | sufficiently costly to have to study so hard, take so many difficult courses, just to signal that |
1:21.9 | you're as good as men, and basically the employers' beliefs are reinforced. Women don't invest in |
1:28.8 | those skills, and the employer is correct in thinking that women are less likely to invest in these |
1:33.4 | skills. The scenario Heather describes is a self-fulfilling one that's often based on perceptions. |
1:40.0 | It could be perceptions about anything, how hard working someone is, how smart or capable they are, |
1:46.0 | how affable they are. But the challenging thing about perceptions is that they're hard to prove |
1:51.4 | with numbers. If you're creative though, it's not an impossible problem to solve. |
2:01.2 | I was interested in this question about how we attribute success and failure. If someone performs |
2:07.3 | really well at their job, do we think that that person's really great at this job, or do we think |
2:12.0 | that they kind of got lucky or got help? If they perform poorly one day, do we think that they just |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.