meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The History of the Americans

#70 Sidebar: Justice Gorsuch and the “Insular Cases”

The History of the Americans

Jack Henneman

History

4.9632 Ratings

🗓️ 27 April 2022

⏱️ 31 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

This episode is a “Sidebar,” which is our term for an episode that is off the timeline of the History of the Americans. This episode centers on a concurring opinion delivered by Justice Neil Gorsuch in a case handed down by the United States Supreme Court only a few days ago, on April 21, 2022. The case, United States vs. Vaello Madero, addresses a pretty unexciting question to most of us — whether the Constitution requires Congress to extend Supplemental Security Income benefits to residents of Puerto Rico to the same extent it makes those benefits available to the residents of the States. That is not the interesting part.

Justice Gorsuch’s concurring opinion is, however, very interesting, an eloquent re-telling of the history of a series of cases — the “Insular Cases” — handed down in the years following the Spanish-American war, the moment in which the United States started dabbling in the European habit of true empire building. The Insular Cases are both an analytical mess and remain on the books as bad law today, as Justice Gorsuch compellingly argues. Enjoy!

Selected references for this episode

United States v. Vaello Madero

Daniel Immerwahr, How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States

Insular Cases (Wikipedia)

Plessy v. Ferguson (Wikipedia)

U.S. Citizen Vs U.S. National: Differences

“Breaker Morant,” epitaph scene

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to the History of the Americans podcast, Episode 70.

0:10.9

I'm your host, Jack Heneman, and I'm recording this episode on April 26, 2022, in Austin, Texas.

0:20.3

We are telling the history of the lands now encompassed by the United States from the beginning without presentism.

0:27.7

This episode is a sidebar, which is our term for an episode that is off the timeline of the history of the Americans.

0:35.7

The term sidebar is my way of signaling that the episode

0:39.0

need not be listened to in sequence. I often say that I am following my muse, by which I mean

0:46.2

that I don't really have a plan. Or more accurately, I am willing to ignore my plan when I

0:51.8

see something that interests me. So it was this week with a

0:55.8

decision handed down by the Supreme Court of the United States only five days ago on April 21st,

1:01.5

2022. In the case of the United States versus Vallejo Madero, the decision itself is not terribly

1:10.7

interesting. By an eight to one vote with

1:14.0

Justice Sotomayor dissenting, the court held that the United States Constitution does not

1:19.7

require Congress to extend supplementary security income benefits to residents of Puerto Rico. To the same extent it makes those

1:29.5

benefits available to residents of the states. The court's result was pretty predictable,

1:35.7

and so far as it followed longstanding law, holding that because Congress chose to treat

1:41.2

residents of Puerto Rico differently from residents of the states for

1:45.1

purposes of taxation, it could do the same for benefits. It's the concurring opinion of Justice

1:52.9

Neil Gorsuch that interests me. It is essentially a history of the judicial decisions that govern the

1:59.7

extent to which the United States

2:01.4

Constitution and the rights thereunder apply to territories of the United States that are not

2:08.5

states. I thought it was so good that I would read it as its own episode. Before we get to Justice

2:16.7

Gorsuch, a little background as an order. In 1898, the United States and

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Jack Henneman, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Jack Henneman and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.