673: The Way to Prevent Being Duped, with Mike Caulfield
Coaching for Leaders
Dave Stachowiak
4.8 • 1.6K Ratings
🗓️ 25 March 2024
⏱️ 39 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Mike Caulfield: Verified
Mike Caulfield is a research scientist at the University of Washington’s Center for an Informed Public, where he studies the spread of online rumors and misinformation. He has taught thousands of teachers and students how to verify claims and sources through his workshops. His SIFT methodology is taught by hundreds of research libraries across North America, and a shorter version of SIFT instruction, developed with Google, has been taught in public libraries across the world.
His work on Web Literacy for Student Fact-Checkers, won the Merlot Award for best open learning resource in the ICT category. His work has been covered by The New York Times, the Chronicle of Higher Education, NPR, The Wall Street Journal, USA Today, and the MIT Technology Review. He is the author with Sam Wineburg of Verified: How to Think Straight, Get Duped Less, and Make Better Decisions about What to Believe Online*.
We’ve all seen something online that we thought was true, but turned out was a hoax. Annoying, but no big deal if it’s just an internet meme from a friend or family member. But what if what you find online isn’t at all what you thought and you make decisions or take action on it that affects your professional credibility? In this conversation, Mike and I discuss how to guard yourself from being duped.
Key Points
- Rather than asking, “Is this true?” the more useful question is, “Do I know what I’m looking at here?”
- The cheap signals many of us were trained to watch for (working links, attractive design, about pages, proper domains) are easy to replicate and no longer correlate to credibility.
- Phrase questions to search engines in neutral ways for less biased results. Instead of “Are soda taxes a good idea?” ask “Do soda taxes work?”
- While Wikipedia still has bias, it’s a far more credible source that many of us were taught — and a valuable source for a broad perspective of a topic or organization.
- Intelligent people often read vertically, to their detriment. The best fact-checkers read laterally by using the rest of the web to read the web.
- Watch for phrases like “sponsored content,” “brand partner,” “presented with,” “in partnership with,” “brought to you by,” “in association with,” or “hosted by.” These phrases signal advertisements.
Resources Mentioned
- Verified: How to Think Straight, Get Duped Less, and Make Better Decisions about What to Believe Online* by Mike Caulfield and Sam Wineburg
Interview Notes
Download my interview notes in PDF format (free membership required).
Related Episodes
- The Way to Make Better Decisions, with Annie Duke (episode 499)
- Get People Reading What You’re Sending, with Todd Rogers (episode 666)
- How to Enhance Your Credibility (audio course)
Discover More
Activate your free membership for full access to the entire library of interviews since 2011, searchable by topic. To accelerate your learning, uncover more inside Coaching for Leaders Plus.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | We've all seen something online we thought was true, but turned out was a hoax. |
| 0:05.6 | Annoying, but no big deal if it's just an internet meme from a friend or family member. |
| 0:11.8 | But what if what you find online isn't it all what you thought |
| 0:15.8 | and you make decisions or take action on it that affects your professional |
| 0:21.3 | credibility? On this episode how to guard your affects your Produced by Innovate Learning, Maximizing Human Potential. |
| 0:37.0 | Greetings to you from Orange County, California. This is coaching for leaders and I'm your host, Dave Stahoviac. Leaders aren't born. They're made. And this weekly show helps you discover leadership wisdom through insightful |
| 0:55.8 | conversations. |
| 0:57.6 | One of the ways we also try to find wisdom is through good sources online. How do we find information that's the most useful to us, to |
| 1:06.4 | our teams and our organizations? That is a lot harder to do than it used to be. In a generation ago, we looked to the major newspapers, the major networks as primary sources |
| 1:19.7 | for finding what was happening in the world and helping us to make decisions. |
| 1:23.7 | Today it is so much more complicated given the state of the internet and the web and it requires |
| 1:30.5 | a different way of thinking. Today I'm so glad to have someone on the show |
| 1:35.1 | who is an expert at helping us think about how do we make sense of what's online? |
| 1:39.5 | How do we avoid being duped or at least prevent it a bit and how to think about this through some very simple and research-based tactics that we can use that will help us to do a better job at finding the information that we need. |
| 1:54.7 | I'm so pleased to introduce Mike Caulfield. |
| 1:56.6 | He is a research scientist at the University of Washington Center for an informed public |
| 2:01.6 | where he studies the spread of online rumors and misinformation. |
| 2:05.8 | He has taught thousands of teachers and students how to verify claims and sources through his workshops. |
| 2:11.1 | His Sift methodology is taught by hundreds of research libraries across North America |
| 2:15.5 | and a shorter version of sift introduction developed with Google has been taught in public libraries |
| 2:20.4 | across the world. His work on web literacy for student fact checkers won the |
| 2:25.0 | Merleau Award for Best Open Learning Resource in the ICT category. He was also a runner-up |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Dave Stachowiak, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Dave Stachowiak and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

