63. Eric Kandel (Nobel Laureate neuroscientist) - The Eye of the Beholder
Think Again - a Big Think Podcast
Big Think / Panoply
4.6 • 594 Ratings
🗓️ 10 September 2016
⏱️ 38 minutes
🔗️ Recording | iTunes | RSS
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Hi there, I'm Jason Gautz, and you're listening to Think Again, a Big Think podcast. |
| 0:09.0 | Since 2008, Big Think has been sharing big ideas in little doses from some of the most creative thinkers around. |
| 0:18.0 | On the Think Again podcast, we take ourselves out of our comfort zone, surprising my |
| 0:22.7 | guests and me, your host, with unexpected interview clips from Big Thinks archives, ideas |
| 0:29.5 | that we didn't necessarily come here prepared to discuss. Today, I'm so happy to be joined |
| 0:34.0 | by Professor Eric Kandel of Columbia University. In the year 2000, he won the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for pioneering work on understanding how memory is stored in the brain |
| 0:45.3 | by studying a particular type of sea snail with a relatively simple nervous system. |
| 0:50.3 | In his recent books, he's been pioneering in a very different way, |
| 0:53.3 | trying to bridge the gap between the quote-unquote two cultures of the sciences and the humanities. |
| 0:59.0 | His current book, Reductionism in Art and Brain Science, continues this work, looking at the ways both modern art and science reduce complex phenomena down to their component parts to achieve new insights and effects. |
| 1:13.2 | Welcome to think again, Professor Kendall. Thank you very much. I guess maybe we should start with |
| 1:18.3 | the cultural divide between the humanities and the sciences. I mean, this is a very big topic, but |
| 1:24.6 | maybe you want to start with a bit of an overview of how that happened? |
| 1:29.4 | Yes. I mean, this was in the late 1950s and early 1960s, C.P. Snow wrote a series of, gave a series |
| 1:37.9 | of lectures and wrote a series of essays on the divide between the humanities and the sciences. |
| 1:43.8 | He thought that this was an unbridgeable divide |
| 1:47.3 | because humanists and scientists not only had different aspirations, different goals, but used |
| 1:55.1 | different methodologies. And the point that I try to make in this book, the overriding theme, |
| 1:59.9 | is that humanistic |
| 2:01.7 | aspirations are not unique to people who are called humanists, but scientists can also have |
| 2:07.8 | humanistic aspirations. |
| 2:09.7 | And all immodesty, I can say, that the study of learning and memory is a humanistic ideal. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Big Think / Panoply, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Big Think / Panoply and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

