All right. Good evening, everybody. Hope you doing well. This is a follow-up to my conversation

slash debate with the fellow about religion and morals and ethics on the nature and existence

of God. The show is called, which was the 30th of December 2025, and I wanted to follow up, not to litigate after the

trial, it's done, so to speak, but to talk about the challenges of teaching children morality.

So, of course, when children are no longer babies and are in the toddler phase, you need to teach

them not to hit, not to grab, not to push, not to steal, and so on, and to be, you know,

good children. And the problem, of course, with hyper-complicated explanations of morality.

If you look at something like Kant, if you look at something like a Hegel or Nietzsche, of course,

you wouldn't really go to very far for morality.

But when you look at a variety of people and their arguments for morality,

then you have a problem, right?

And the problem, of course, is that it's too complicated to teach children.

If you were to say to somebody, you can only be moral when you are fluent in English, Latin, and ancient Greek,

right? If that would be your argument, then clearly it takes many years to become competent

in those three languages and it would be, you know, functionally and practically impossible for the

child to be, for the person to be moral. So with religion, with, again, I'll speak about Christianity,

which of course is the religion I'm most familiar with, if you say to kids, well, you can't steal because that's wrong,

and God says thou shalt not steal. You shouldn't lie because thou shalt not bear false witness.

You should not hit. I mean, there's not any sort of specific thing about that in the Bible,

like in the Ten Commandments and so on,

but in general we have a don't, don't hit, don't whack.

Other kids in the face.

...