One of the names that keeps coming up has a criminal record.

He's well known to police in different jurisdictions.

And as you heard, everybody in town thinks's the drug hookup.

That's that.

Is he having to do with this case?

I have no idea.

Right?

That's the frustrating part. Just because somebody in town is on everybody's radar,

rumored to be some bad guy that might be involved with Crystal's disappearance,

that doesn't make it true. In fact, if it was so obvious and true,

that person had already been in custody. Because the Sheriff's Department knows the name and

I suspect that they've checked it out every which way and have some

suspicions on their own whether he's the right guy. I think he knows what's going

on and I think that some of associates may even know more.

We certainly know catfish is.

And I know that catfish and his friend

have been spoken to by detectives.

So they shouldn't be surprised that their names coming up.

The real balance, journalistically, is what are the liabilities of reporting somebody's identity who may ultimately never be charged or directly be involved?

I guess that the one that comes to mind is the Richard Jewell case at

Atlanta Olympics, the bombing, the security guard. He came to help. He had to be the

guy and everybody reported it. Can't take it back, right?

...