Thank you for listening to The Rest is History.

For weekly bonus episodes,

add free listening, early access to series,

and membership of our much-loved chat community,

go to therestishistory.com and join the club.

That is, the rest is history.com. It was not the Darnley murder which brought Mary down.

The fact was that an embarrassment had been removed, a problem resolved.

There was no doubt whatsoever that Mary could have continued

her reign, free of the albatross, because that was precisely what people wanted. What she had to do,

as Elizabeth and Catherine de Medici, both of whom stood by her in February 1567, begged her to do, was to preserve an appearance of innocence,

allow the scandal to burn itself out, enable stability to return.

Rulers did recover from great scandals in the 16th century, the Bartholomew's Day massacre,

the execution of Mary Queen of Scots herself were headline news in Europe

and infinitely more dangerous to their perpetrators than the murder of Darnley. The problem,

therefore, was not the murder. It was the infinitely unwise behaviour of Darnley's widow.

So that was the historian Jenny Wormald in her biography of Mary Queen of Scots,

which has the splendid title, A Study in Failure.

She hates Mary Queen of Scots.

So in our last episode, Tom, we described the events leading up to the murder of Mary's second husband, Lord Darnley, who you don't rate as a man. I don't rate him either. We described the murder and we described the suspects and the aftermath. And we went through in true crime podcasting style, going through all the different conspirators and explaining, sort of exploring

the moments that led up to the murder itself.

And we identified the conspirators, a large cross-section of the Scottish nobility.

Talk us through them.

...