4.6 • 3.6K Ratings
🗓️ 13 June 2021
⏱️ 39 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | We love our work very much. |
0:05.0 | We're work lovers to say it. |
0:07.0 | I'm Angela Duckworth. |
0:08.5 | I'm Stephen Dobner. |
0:09.5 | And you're listening to no stupid questions. |
0:13.0 | Today on the show, why is academic writing so bad? |
0:17.0 | Why don't we turn it into a mad lives? |
0:19.1 | All you have to do is drop down menus and fill in the blank. |
0:23.6 | Also, what does your perfect day look like and what's preventing you from having more |
0:27.5 | of them? |
0:28.5 | Sunny and 77 degrees today going up from a high of 76 yesterday. |
0:35.5 | Angela, we have a listener question from one David Bowling. |
0:40.3 | Here is my question, David writes, why is academic writing so bad? |
0:44.5 | Part of the answer, he writes, must be that the incentives make it bad. |
0:48.8 | That is to gain tenure and to get published in academic journals, one is rewarded for the |
0:53.0 | denseness of one's writing, not whether it can be easily understood. |
0:57.1 | Also, conciseness and clarity are not rewarded rather they are penalized. |
1:02.4 | Is conciseness a word? |
1:04.0 | I think conciseness is a word but it's not the most concisive words is it? |
1:07.5 | I was thinking it was a concision somehow. |
1:09.5 | I feel like we should be able to do it in fewer than three syllables. |
1:12.5 | Anyway, let's assume that conciseness is a word and move on. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.