4.7 • 695 Ratings
🗓️ 1 January 2020
⏱️ 35 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | The Thank you for coming. I'm always honored when I speak at Sand that anybody comes because there's usually a number of other talks in other rooms that if I had mastered the bi-location city, I would have been attending |
0:38.9 | myself in addition to giving my talk. In fact, I may have done that. I could be in those other rooms. |
0:43.4 | You wouldn't even know, unless you'd mastered it also. Then you'd see me there. But I always |
0:49.5 | appreciate people who come to these talks. It's an honor. The topic of my talk, as you probably know, |
0:55.6 | if you read the program, knowledge is different in different levels or states of consciousness. |
1:01.3 | Another way we might phrase that is reality is different in different states of consciousness. |
1:06.4 | The reason I chose this topic is that in interviewing people and in just talking to people in |
1:13.2 | general, and even in watching the news, you often see people latch on to a particular perspective |
1:19.3 | or understanding and then feel like, you know, that's the way it is. And anything other than that |
1:26.6 | is partial or wrong or something. |
1:31.1 | Charles Eisenstein was talking about just up on stage this morning, how people get polarized |
1:36.8 | into particular perspectives, and then they go down the rabbit hole of that perspective, |
1:41.5 | and they find all kinds of scientific and other kinds of |
1:45.7 | justification for their particular perspective which reinforces it all the more and gives them the |
1:50.8 | impression that all the other ones are really definitely wrong but and I'm going to take some |
1:56.0 | specific examples of this in a minute but first of all here's a nice little quote from the Saga Data |
2:01.3 | Maharaj. He and others have emphasized that we need to learn to appreciate paradox and perhaps |
2:08.0 | ambiguity to accommodate contradictory viewpoints within a broader perspective. I don't generally |
2:14.1 | like to use the word enlightenment, but if we could just use it for the sake of convenience here, |
2:18.5 | if we think of enlightenment as being as the realization of totality, and what could realize totality, |
2:26.6 | it would have to be the totality itself, because if an individual can't realize totality anymore |
2:32.5 | than a fish could swallow the ocean. There's a saying |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Rick Archer, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Rick Archer and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.