meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Freedomain with Stefan Molyneux

5176 How (and Why) to Love Your Enemies!

Freedomain with Stefan Molyneux

Stefan Molyneux

Economics, Anarchism, Stefan, News & Politics, Atheist, Higher Education, Religion & Spirituality, Stephen, Government, God, Philosophy, Violence, Freedomain, Rogan, Ron, Society & Culture, Radio, Paul, History, Liberalism, Libertarian, Capitalism, Market, Molyneux, Anarchy, Free, Classical, Family, Freedom, State, Joe, Podcast, Atheism, Stephan, Education, Podcasts

4.62.4K Ratings

🗓️ 12 May 2023

⏱️ 119 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Freedomain Livestream 10 May 2023

You remarked recently on stream that c02 makes up a fraction of 1 percent of the atmosphere, and that we are perhaps overly fixated on the tiny portion in regard to climate change.
But surely the fact that atmospheric fluctuations in C02 can has such a huge impact of the growth of plants, nullifys your suggestion that it is 'too small a proportion' to be significant.
Sorry if I'm butchering your analysis but it seemed somewhat contradictory and I known you love a good critique!


Stefan, I’m a bit Spectrum and sometimes the way I articulate is misinterpreted as offensive (accusatory, passive aggressive, critical) when I make an assertive statement or a simple interrogative (albeit, I acknowledge the awkwardness in my language).
I often have difficulties getting even family members, who should be used to my style of language, to understand my questions as genuine, non-antagonistic inquiries.
How can I get people to just take my words at face value. It seems the more accurate I attempt to form my words, the worse it gets. I’ve totally given up on communicating with the emotionally dysregulated marxist on the left (their linguistic format is the extreme opposite of mine - seeking to disguise their actual intent in sophistry), but at a minimum I want to find a way to indicate to the people I care about most that my intent is genuine without guile.

Stef, your recent dream analysys call in was spot on! I was listening to it thinking "how can he be describing my life som accurately"

Hey Stef thanks for everything with your show. Helped me so much in life. Do you have a recommended reading list on things you’ve read that have helped you come to your philosophical perspective?

Listened to several Harvard Lectures on Philosophy today, I wonder if the amount of utilitarians change from before and after to any significant degree. There were very few Libertarians out of hundreds of people, even 13ish years ago

When I was younger I used to think the wrong politician getting elected would cause the end of the world. It was a nightmare living like that.

I hate utilitarianism. It makes no sense to say you can define the greater good, when you can't even define normal good.

Took this truth flamethrower with my dad recently and resulted in massive insults. Then he looped my brother into it, where he insulting and name calling me too and it’s still difficult to tell myself that it’s for the best. Do you have any tips on how to better deal with this?

How do you process guilt of potentially giving up too early on a friend? An old friend of mine died this year from alcohol withdrawals. I had not been in contact with him in 4 years. Probably not enough info here...

Stef is that why some gravitate to determinism? Some sort of narcissistic grief?

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome my friends to the Wednesday night, y'all.

0:03.2

I am going to go through a true smog as Borg of amateur actor accents tonight.

0:07.7

All right.

0:09.0

I, Steph, you've recently remarked on a stream that CO2 makes up a fraction of 1% of the atmosphere

0:16.1

and that we are perhaps overly fixated on the tiny portion in regard to climate change.

0:20.0

But surely the fact that atmospheric fluctuations in CO2 has such a huge impact on the growth of plants

0:25.3

nullifies your suggestion that it's too small a proportion to be significant.

0:33.2

I'm sorry if I'm butchering your analysis but it seems somewhat contradictory and I know you'll

0:36.6

have a good critique. Right. So I'm sure you know but back in the past CO2 levels were

0:46.0

what do we 390, 400. It was like 6,7000 in the past and life was fine. See here's the basic thing.

0:53.4

Life over 4 billion years has been a lot of fluctuations. You know,

0:56.4

ice age is hot ages and so on. There's even little ice age is in the middle of your period.

1:00.2

So there's been a huge fluctuation in climate. Now when you are riding a bicycle,

1:09.6

bicycle, when you're riding a bicycle, sometimes you wobble, right? And then you correct.

1:15.0

Right now if you couldn't correct your wobbling, you just tip over and I don't know if you've

1:18.1

ever done it when you're just learning your wobble gets too big and you tip over.

1:21.8

So for life to survive for billions and billions of years, the planet has to achieve

1:30.6

a self-correcting equilibrium. That doesn't mean of course that everything's you know your

1:34.3

bike wheels are always wobbling but you adjust them back to the center, right? Maybe you turn a

1:38.1

little bit, right? You turn, you want to go right, you turn and then you straighten out again,

1:41.4

right? You don't just go in a circle, right? So a self-correcting mechanism is absolutely

1:47.2

required, essential. Life could not evolve without it. Life's been on the earth for what,

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Stefan Molyneux, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Stefan Molyneux and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.