Today on the AI Daily Brief, five debates shaping announcements before we dive in.

First of all, thank you to today's sponsors, KPMG, super intelligent, robots and pencils,

and Vanta.

To get an ad-free version of the show, go to patreon.com slash AI Daily Brief.

And to get information about sponsoring the show,

shoot us a note at sponsors at AIdailybreep.a.i. Welcome back to the AI Daily Brief Headlines

edition, all the daily AI news you need in around five minutes. We kick off today with a story

from last week, a big update around one of the copyright cases swirling around the AI

industry. Anthropic has agreed to pay $1.5 billion

to authors in a landmark AI copyright settlement, making it the largest settlement in the history

of U.S. copyright law.

Now, back in June, a judge ruled that Anthropics' use of around 500,000 books in training

data was fair use.

However, the judge found that Anthropic would still be liable for copyright infringement for pirating the books rather than purchasing them. That claim comes with a hefty per infringement penalty, so Anthropic couldn't really risk going to trial and ending up with a ruling in the tens of billions. A settlement fund will be used to make cash payments to impacted authors and to cover legal costs. Now, as you might imagine, the debate very quickly became, is this good for Anthropic? Is this good for authors? Is this good for both? Is this good for no one? TechCrunch took the view, and it's right there in the title that the settlement, quote, sucks for writers. They noted that each of the half a million authors affected would only receive $3,000 settlement checks, and frankly, that assumes that legal costs won't reduce the number, so that's probably

even a little bit generous. By way of comparison in February, Microsoft offered authors working

for Harper-Collins $5,000 per book to be included in training data, split evenly between

publishers and authors. It's also noteworthy that under this ruling, AI companies can train on any data they obtain legally, throwing into question the need to license books rather than just buying them off the shelf. Simon Willison tweeted, "...am I the only person who thinks this $1.5 billion-dollar anthropic book settlement counts as a win for Anthropic? Later, he said, to clarify, it appears it is legal, at least in the USA. To buy a used copy of a

physical book, chop the spine off, scan the pages, discard the paper copy, and then train on the

scan data. The transformation from paper to scan is fair use. Fairly trained CEO Ed Newton

Rex said that part is a win for them agreed, although pointed out the judges in other instances

of AI lawsuits weren't necessarily taking the same approach, and said that, quote, the $1.5 billion

to rights holders, though, is a win for rights holders, particularly as many other companies

...