It's the Armstrongy Getty Show. Welcome. How are you? Glad you're here. Thank you for tuning in.

The Washington Post with an article this morning about the release of the

Parkland Florida shooter videos and you know the only thing worth mentioning in

this it's it's funny not funny ha ha funny strange and discouraging you read

this article and they state several times or ask several times depending on

how you look at it. His guilt has not been questioned. He's confessed his

attorney's readily admit he was a gunman. It's a troubled young man disturbing

pattern behavior. But what motivated him to open fire remains unanswered. Then they

go on with the article about the videos in which he says specifically why he

wanted to do this. So it'd become famous. So people would know who he was to take

out revenge on his on on the world. And then the victims weigh in and say I tortured

myself watching this video. Don't do it. Here's how you put a great way to stop school

shootings is never mentioned the shooter's name or give them notoriety. He discussed

how the world will know who he is. He wanted this. And then another victim says he deserves

no attention. Here's who does. And then lists the names of the victims the victims who

were killed. And again, the article says, you know, some people have advocated

the limited news coverage of the shooter to prevent them, you know, achieving the

notoriety they deserve. And yet the article still says, well, his motivation remains unanswered.

How can that be? How thoroughly can you answer something? You go. Okay. That's like the

joke we had earlier. If you don't know what introspection is, you need to take a long

look at yourself. Right. It's like that joke. You're discussing with lots of people

including the victims on how and the shooter and the shooter. Wow. And he answers it

...