Hey guys, Guy here. Monday morning, and I'm still trying to find the Giants Dodgers game from Sunday.

Oh, I found it. But I can only watch it on my iPad. Cool.

Anyway, Juan Jennings wants a new contract. I just did a live stream on YouTube about it.

Here's that conversation. Good for Juan Jennings on this one. I really had no choice. His agent,

at last check the agent, I've not seen them cited today, but at less check, when he did the deal

last year, the agent for Juan Jennings was reported as the Rosenhouse Brothers. So here we are.

They've been asking. They haven't been getting.

And that's what they did.

Here's the Schaefter story.

And it's pretty clear.

Now, I don't think, you know, as always is the case when you do a little bit of an ultimatum like this.

You don't necessarily have all the power that you say you have, but this is the way it works.

Trade, trade me or pay me. I think Jennings is in a similar boat to Brock in that he's making relatively so little, although he was making seven times scheduled to make seven and a half million, which is seven times what Purdy was going to make. But he's making so

little that a significant race to him is not a significant contract from a like a receiver standpoint,

right? If you're making seven and a half million dollars is 15 million dollars with a couple more

years after that a reasonable contract for you to accept i would say it is you know the thing that a

player never says or an agent never says when they make a contract demand is what it is exactly

that we're demanding we want want a new deal. Well,

how much do you want? It makes it hard for me to understand which side to take if I don't know how

much you want. If you want, you know, three years and $45 million, I'm just pulling that number

straight out of thin air based on doubling his current salary for this year, then it's easy for me to take your side.

If you want, you know, like, I think I'm a better player than IUC, so I want more money than IUC.

...