meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
People I (Mostly) Admire

45. Leidy Klotz on Why the Best Solutions Involve Less — Not More

People I (Mostly) Admire

Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher

Society & Culture

4.61.9K Ratings

🗓️ 18 September 2021

⏱️ 41 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

When we try to improve things, our first thought is often: What can we add to make this better? But Leidy, a professor of engineering, says we tend to overlook the fact that a better solution might be to take something away. He and Steve talk about examples from Leidy’s book Subtract: The Untapped Science of Less, and from their own lives.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

My guest today, Lighty Clots, is an engineering professor at the University of Virginia who works at the intersection of engineering and behavioral economics.

0:14.0

Who even knew those two fields intersected?

0:18.0

Welcome to People I Mostly Admire, with Steve Levitt.

0:24.0

Lighty summarizes his research ideas in a new book, it's called Subtract, the Untapped Science of Less.

0:31.0

Now, being totally honest, when I first saw Lighty's book, I just missed it as schlock.

0:36.0

One of the hundreds of mediocre pop science books published every year.

0:40.0

But my friend, Sandel Muldinaten, who we might remember from two previous episodes of this podcast, said, no, Lighty's book is different.

0:47.0

There's something really fundamental there.

0:49.0

And Sandel's right about everything, so I gave Subtract a second chance and I realized, yes, there actually is something here.

0:57.0

With my newfound appreciation for what he's doing, I'm excited to talk to Lighty for the first time now.

1:09.0

You've written a book called Subtract, and you've done a ton of academic research on the topic.

1:14.0

Like, most good ideas, it seems like there is an extremely simple insight at the heart of your argument.

1:20.0

What is that?

1:21.0

When we try to improve things, our first thought is, what can we add to make this better?

1:27.0

And as a result, we overlook subtraction systematically.

1:31.0

I think there's an even simpler statement, which is that there's a human bias against subtraction.

1:38.0

Behavioral economists have been working on biases for 40 or 50 years.

1:43.0

And I think it puts a squirreling idea of, here's something that doesn't happen as much as it should, and that's the nature of what biases.

1:51.0

So, do you like that description, or you're not like the description?

1:53.0

I like it.

1:54.0

One quibble would be with, well, we don't want to just have this considered alongside the laundry list of biases that are out there.

2:01.0

Some of them less fundamental than others, because we think this is a pretty fundamental one.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.