Grimer girl here. Remember how last week we said that another whole thing is

different from a whole another thing? This week we're going to talk about

something similar. Sometimes a sentence doesn't quite end up where you're

expecting. For example a recent tweet by James Martin goes like this, a woman

gives birth in the UK every 48 seconds. She must be exhausted. Let's think about

that sentence again. A woman gives birth in the UK every 48 seconds. She must

be exhausted. The ordinary way to interpret the sentence is for a woman to mean

a different woman each time. But sure enough if you think about it for a second

it could also refer to the highly improbable scenario in which the same woman

gives birth 1800 times a day. At the risk of spoiling the joke let's look at

how it is that we can get two meanings out of this one sentence. A situation

that linguists refer to as scopol ambiguity. Let's go for a slightly simpler

sentence to make the two meanings more clear. The sentence everybody loves

somebody has two possible readings. In the first reading it's true about all

people that each of them has some person whom they love. But it's not

necessarily the same person. In the second reading there's some particular

person whom everybody loves. Another way of saying this is that in the first

reading we interpret the every is having scope over the sum for every person

there is some other person. While in the second reading we interpret the sum as

having scope over the every there is some person whom every other person

loves. So if we go back to the original sentence we can see the same two

readings going on. I'm going to paraphrase them to make it a little more

...