Hey there, folks. Welcome back. As you know, if you have followed me at all, I have been somebody who

believes that, you know, if you want a great country like America, where people have liberty

and freedom, you have to have actual elections.

You know, I'm funny.

I'm fussy that way.

I'm fussy that way. But it turns out there are other people that are similarly fussy.

One of the best of the best is my friend and my guest right now, Sydney Powell.

Hop on the train. right now. Sydney, Powell, an American hero.

I hate to embarrass you, Sydney, but welcome to the program.

Thanks for everything you're doing and talking about.

What can we talk about on this issue?

You've been talking about it a lot. You've spoken about it on this program. What's happening right now? Because there's so many people who care about this. Thank God. Yes. I know there are lots of places where citizens are trying to get hand counting of the vote passed. Dallas County was one of them. But the county kept throwing up obstacle after obstacle and saying there's this other thing you have to do. There's an additional thing you have to do

just on and on. So apparently it's not going to happen in Dallas County this spring. I am personally

convinced that until we get paper ballots that are handmarked and hand counted,

any use of a machine at any stage of the process will corrupt the process or can corrupt the process.

It will make it completely untrustworthy because any part of a computer program can be hacked or programmed to begin with to do something wrong. And that's what has

happened all across the country for frankly the last 20, 24 years, ever since a computer was

first used in the election. Well, it sounds like common sense. So the question is, why would people

be arguing against this? In other words, is it wrong to conclude that they are simply corrupt? Is it wrong to conclude that they're simply criminals who want to get away with more crime? Is there any other conclusion you can make? What is the argument?

I can't find another conclusion. They say that hand counting will be more expensive, blah, blah, blah, and not as reliable. Well, nothing can be less reliable than the machines. We have a banking system that counts down to the penny accurately,

and if there's the slightest discrepancy, it's a big problem. Here, we're relying on machines to do

our votes and count our votes, and we know that they're being manipulated and rigged and programmed wrong.

...