meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
People I (Mostly) Admire

31. Peter Leeson on Why Trial-by-Fire Wasn’t Barbaric and Why Pirates Were Democratic

People I (Mostly) Admire

Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher

Society & Culture

4.62K Ratings

🗓️ 12 June 2021

⏱️ 46 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

He’s an economist who studies even weirder things than Steve. They discuss whether economics is the best of the social sciences, and why it’s a good idea to get a tattoo of a demand curve on your bicep.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

The topics I study are unusual for an economist. Things like cheating and sumo wrestling,

0:09.6

a link between abortion and crime, the perils of walking drunk. But on the scale of weirdness,

0:16.1

I can't even be keen to compete with my guest today, Pete Leason. The list of subjects he

0:21.6

studied till to depure absurdity, everything from the practice of wife-selling in industrial

0:27.1

revolution era England, to trials in Italy in the 15th to 17th century, in which insects were

0:32.9

the defendants. And even what are called ordeals, the medieval practice of determining innocence

0:38.1

or guilt by plunging someone's hand into boiling water. Welcome to people I mostly admire,

0:46.9

with Steve Levitt. But the amazing thing about Pete Leason is that he takes these crazy topics

0:53.8

and through a brilliant mix of meticulous historical research, data gathering, and creative

0:58.9

economic thinking, he shows that these seemingly nonsensical practices actually make a whole lot

1:04.4

of sense once you understand them. I can't think of another economist whose work has so consistently

1:09.9

blown my mind. And I'm pretty confident he will do the same to you.

1:17.2

Way too much time has passed since we last spoke. Has been a decade and more?

1:21.6

It's been about 10 years if you can believe it, Steve. Let's wait too long and even if we haven't

1:26.8

been talking, I've made a point of following your research because I can honestly say there's

1:32.4

nobody else like you in the field of economics. So before we do anything else, I think we need to

1:37.8

give people a few examples of your research. Could you provide a little history lesson?

1:43.8

What were ordeals and when were they used? Absolutely. For about 400 years between the

1:50.5

night century and the early 13th, the most sophisticated legal systems in Europe conducted physical

1:58.2

tests in criminal cases to determine the guilt or innocent of accused suspects. In the classic

2:06.2

medieval judicial ordeal as these things were called, the priest or the cleric who was overseeing

2:11.9

the trial boiled a pot of water into which he threw a stone or ring. He then asked the criminal

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Freakonomics Radio + Stitcher and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.