meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Tech Policy Podcast

#3: SOTU Reaction & the Big Picture of Tech Policy

Tech Policy Podcast

TechFreedom

Technology

4.8 • 46 Ratings

🗓️ 13 January 2016

⏱️ 22 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

In Episode 2, we discussed what President Obama SHOULD have said in his State of the Union Address—In Episode #3 we examine what he ACTUALLY said, and the implications. We discuss mandates to report “terrorist activities” online, net neutrality, “universal service” subsidies and taxes for telecommunications services, whether America is really in decline, innovation as reason for optimism, the technocratic mentality of the Apollo program, the stagnation thesis, and specific opportunities for bipartisan compromise.

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to the tech policy podcast, your source for policy rants and raves from Tech Freedom,

0:18.6

your Washington, D.C. advocate for the freedom to tinker and

0:21.7

innovate. Joining me in our DC studio is Fun-loving Dictator and founder of Tech Freedom, Baron Soka.

0:28.2

Baron, thank you for joining me yet again. Thanks for inviting me back.

0:32.9

Yesterday, we said Obama wouldn't say much about tech in his final state of the union as president,

0:37.4

but here's what he did say. Today we said Obama wouldn't say much about tech in his final state of the union as president,

0:39.0

but here's what he did say.

0:46.1

Priority number one is protecting the American people and going after terrorist networks.

0:57.4

Both al-Qaeda and now ISIL pose a direct threat to our people because in today's world, even a handful of terrorists who place no value on human life, including their own, can do a lot of damage.

1:03.1

They use the Internet to poison the minds of individuals inside our country.

1:10.6

Their actions undermine and destabilize our allies.

1:13.6

Barron, what's the president talking about?

1:16.6

Well, he's talking about a bipartisan bill. Senator Dian Feinstein has introduced a bill called

1:22.6

the Reporting of Online Terrorist Act Act, and that really would require social media companies to do something they're already doing, which is to tell the government when they have the knowledge of terrorist activities.

1:36.3

That bill is in some ways uncontroversial. If you look at it, it doesn't sound like the kind of thing that should be problematic.

1:42.3

Yes, it only applies if a company has actual knowledge, which is a high legal bar, but it doesn't define what

1:49.5

terrorist activities are. It leaves that incredibly open-ended. So our concern is that companies are

1:55.8

going to start having to report anything that they think might conceivably later be interpreted to be terrorist

2:02.6

activities. And that could include far more than just ISIS activities. It could include

2:06.8

anything that might be potentially suspicious. So the concern is that by putting a mandate or

2:12.2

requirement on a company to do something that they're already doing that they might be overreporting,

2:16.9

which could have a

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from TechFreedom, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of TechFreedom and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.