Please be advised this story contains adult content and graphic language. As Daniel Wozniak's defense attorney, you've said you feel you didn't receive a fair trial in Wozniak's case.

Can you give us an example of what you consider an unfair ruling that

prevented evidence from being introduced?

Well, you know, one of the examples certainly is the Samher evidence.

Sammer having killed somebody in his past. Welcome to Sleuth everyone. I'm Linda Sawyer. We're here with Scott Sanders, Daniel Wozniac's defense attorney. The trial began

in late December of 2015, correct? Right. And then went into the penalty phase early January ended mid-January would you say of 2016.

One of the most important timing elements that's going on in this case right now is that there is a trial taking

place of Daniel Wozniac's ex-fiancé Rachel Buffett. Daniel Wozniac was in

fact convicted of the crimes he committed and confessed to the capital case the penalty

was in fact death and he is on death row at this point but from what I've learned over the years I've been working on this case is that I feel in many ways

Daniel would have never committed these crimes if he had not met Rachel Buffett

So with her trial coming up I really wanted to talk to you

about the case and the charges and how you feel about the likelihood that there might be a conviction here and so if we could go over

these in more detail I'd appreciate it. So the first felony charge involves

Rachel Buffett lying to police about a fictitious man in a black hat.

And the basis for that charge, something I know that you in court spoke about with Judge Connolly

regarding an issue where you felt

prosecutor Matt Murphy was in fact committing a double argument if you will

about the same person and you can't move from one courtroom and say one thing and move to another

court and say another. Let's talk about that. Well right there's there's case

law out there that talks about the fact that you can't make inconsistent arguments in two different cases.

And so our argument to Judge Conley when we came back after the verdict was to say that's precisely what took place was that he made arguments about

...