meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Shameless Popery

#259 Ted Cruz’s Wild Endorsement of Anti-Catholic Tripe

Shameless Popery

Catholic Answers

Christianity, Religion & Spirituality

4.9658 Ratings

🗓️ 19 March 2026

⏱️ 49 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Joe dissects a poorly written, AI-sourced article from X that paints a laughably inaccurate picture of American Catholicism and Catholic Answers specifically. Transcript: Joe: Welcome back to Shameless Popery. I’m Joe Heschmeyer, and it’s not every day that as an apologist for Catholic Answers, I find our work called out in a piece shared by a city and US Senator, but this week I had that unique experience. So Senator Ted Cruz shared a piece by a Twitter user called Insurrection Barbie, and it’s an article, it’s over 8,000 words long, called The Long Game and the Conser...

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome back to Chamis Popery. I'm Joe Heschmire. And it's not every day that as an

0:03.9

apologist for Catholic Answers, I find our work called out in a piece shared by a sitting

0:08.7

U.S. Senator, but this week I had that unique experience. So Senator Ted Cruz shared a piece

0:16.2

by a Twitter user called Insurrection Barbie. And it's an article. It's over 8,000 words long,

0:23.1

called The Long Game and the Conservative Right. But Cruz gave a very strong endorsement of this

0:29.1

article. He said, read every word of this. It's the best and most comprehensive explanation

0:34.3

of what we're fighting. Now, I'm not 100% sure this was written by a human.

0:39.7

It reads like AI slop. It's filled with basic errors. But I think it's striking that he shares

0:46.0

this piece, which calls out Catholic Answers twice by name and gets, as I said, just basic

0:51.8

details wrong, completely misunderstands the theological and political

0:56.1

things that are afoot. And it ought to be worth addressing just a handful of the points made.

1:02.7

So first, I mean, one of the first clues that maybe this wasn't written by a human being is that

1:08.0

there's a section attacking this Catholic position called Integralism.

1:12.0

We used an AI voice to read the article to illustrate how ridiculous the article is.

1:16.6

The voice was chosen completely at random, of course.

1:19.4

The first is Integralism, a pre-Vatican II political theology that holds the Catholic Church

1:23.9

should exercise direct authority over temporal governments, that religious liberty

1:28.2

is a Protestant error, and that a properly ordered state must subordinate itself to church

1:32.7

teaching. This is not the position of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. It is not

1:37.1

the position of Pope Francis. Now, that's kind of striking because as any human being knows,

1:42.8

Pope Francis is not the Pope, but a lot of AI models have

1:47.1

not updated that. So that's the first red flag that maybe we're not actually dealing with

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Catholic Answers, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Catholic Answers and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.