It's going to be very difficult to change that unless you do it from within and say,

I don't care what your perception is, we're going to address the problem in a disruptive way.

But it is not too crazy to think that an outbreak of a novel avian virus could occur in China somewhere. We could get the RNA sequence from

that, beam it to a number of regional centers. Happy Sunday, folks. And today I've a very important

question to share with you. And I would love loads of comments and reply because we really need

to answer this particular philosophical question on how we approach the problems we're facing in the world today.

So in short, there was a Twitter thread was extraordinary over the past week where there was a massive bun fight.

And I was taking the position that COVID for instance was tops down root cause

driven from the top and then mass formation or the tendency of the people to go a bit crazy

right that that was exploited by the people up the top and another crew were trying to say it's all about mass formation.

COVID was just spontaneous and we all just lost our shit, so to speak.

So a huge debate, but for me the crucial question is,

what's the best way to approach this in general to help the people not lose their shit next time.

So I wrote a little essay, put it out on Twitter and Facebook and I'm going to read it for you

now and I would love to get your opinion and am I correct basically because the consequences

of the decisions we make in how we approach the problems in the

world, it's really important which way we go. There's two paths. So I'm going to read now. For me,

the addressable root cause slash solution is to focus on the perps methodically, do the investigative

reporter thing.

This approach also has the major benefit of inoculating people against the tendency towards

mass formation in the future.

Key point, realising you have been actually scammed on an issue by specific bad actors gives

...