meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Dershow

25 year old rape claim on trial in Trump case

The Dershow

Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media

News, Politics

4.41.9K Ratings

🗓️ 26 April 2023

⏱️ 29 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

TAGS

 

Alan Dershowitz's podcast. Dershow media

APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772

SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99

_________________________________________________________

FOLLOW ME:

TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDersh

RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_says

LOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/

YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz

_________________________________________________________

SUPPORT MY WORK:

SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/

 

-- 

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome back to the Dershow. Look, I don't know what happened. It didn't happen in that

0:06.8

dressing room in Bergedoff-Gudman a quarter of the century ago and neither do you and neither

0:14.0

do any of the jurors or the judge. The question is, can you have a fair trial concerning a denied

0:23.3

allegation that happened so long ago beyond the statute of limitations that existed at the time

0:30.6

of the alleged events. Let's assume hypothetically you have a situation where somebody accuses somebody

0:39.7

of something and the person was in a different part of the country at the time and has American

0:45.8

expressed records and phone records and other records that could prove that he or she was three

0:52.5

thousand miles away. 25 years later those records don't exist and so how do you disprove he said,

1:00.1

she said, allegation, how do you particularly disprove it based on a claim that you weren't even

1:07.1

there. I mean this is something that I know a little bit about because I was accused by a woman

1:13.8

I never met, never heard of having sex with her 20 years ago in 2000, 2001 and I was able to

1:24.2

produce massive records of where I was every single day because it was only 20 years ago, although

1:30.6

there were some records that were obviously not as good as others but I was able to do that.

1:40.5

When you go back 25 years it's awfully difficult especially if you don't know you're being accused,

1:48.3

you don't save the records, you don't try to call witnesses. I mean I don't know again the facts

1:54.6

in this case was Donald Trump along when this alleged event occurred, if it occurred at all,

2:02.6

did he have anybody with him? Has he ever been to Bergdorf Goodman? Does he have records of having

2:09.2

been there? It's very, very difficult to reconstruct events a quarter of a century earlier. It's also

2:17.8

unfair to expand the statute of limitations. The statute of limitations should be what it was at

2:24.7

the time that the events occurred but even in the criminal law which the consequences are obviously

2:31.8

more serious, even in the criminal law the government has the right to expand the statute of

2:36.9

limitations but only, only if the statute of limitations hasn't yet expired. So for example if there's

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.