25 year old rape claim on trial in Trump case
The Dershow
Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media
4.4 • 1.9K Ratings
🗓️ 26 April 2023
⏱️ 29 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
TAGS
Alan Dershowitz's podcast. Dershow media
APPLE PODCAST: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-dershow/id1531775772
SPOTIFY: https://open.spotify.com/show/7Cx3Okc9mMNWtQyKJZoqVO?si=1164392dd4144a99
_________________________________________________________
FOLLOW ME:
TWITTER: https://twitter.com/AlanDersh
RUMBLE: https://rumble.com/user/Sav_says
LOCALS: https://dershow.locals.com/
YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/TheDershowWithAlanDershowitz
_________________________________________________________
SUPPORT MY WORK:
SUBSTACK: https://dersh.substack.com/
--
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | Welcome back to the Dershow. Look, I don't know what happened. It didn't happen in that |
| 0:06.8 | dressing room in Bergedoff-Gudman a quarter of the century ago and neither do you and neither |
| 0:14.0 | do any of the jurors or the judge. The question is, can you have a fair trial concerning a denied |
| 0:23.3 | allegation that happened so long ago beyond the statute of limitations that existed at the time |
| 0:30.6 | of the alleged events. Let's assume hypothetically you have a situation where somebody accuses somebody |
| 0:39.7 | of something and the person was in a different part of the country at the time and has American |
| 0:45.8 | expressed records and phone records and other records that could prove that he or she was three |
| 0:52.5 | thousand miles away. 25 years later those records don't exist and so how do you disprove he said, |
| 1:00.1 | she said, allegation, how do you particularly disprove it based on a claim that you weren't even |
| 1:07.1 | there. I mean this is something that I know a little bit about because I was accused by a woman |
| 1:13.8 | I never met, never heard of having sex with her 20 years ago in 2000, 2001 and I was able to |
| 1:24.2 | produce massive records of where I was every single day because it was only 20 years ago, although |
| 1:30.6 | there were some records that were obviously not as good as others but I was able to do that. |
| 1:40.5 | When you go back 25 years it's awfully difficult especially if you don't know you're being accused, |
| 1:48.3 | you don't save the records, you don't try to call witnesses. I mean I don't know again the facts |
| 1:54.6 | in this case was Donald Trump along when this alleged event occurred, if it occurred at all, |
| 2:02.6 | did he have anybody with him? Has he ever been to Bergdorf Goodman? Does he have records of having |
| 2:09.2 | been there? It's very, very difficult to reconstruct events a quarter of a century earlier. It's also |
| 2:17.8 | unfair to expand the statute of limitations. The statute of limitations should be what it was at |
| 2:24.7 | the time that the events occurred but even in the criminal law which the consequences are obviously |
| 2:31.8 | more serious, even in the criminal law the government has the right to expand the statute of |
| 2:36.9 | limitations but only, only if the statute of limitations hasn't yet expired. So for example if there's |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Alan Dershowitz | Kast Media and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

