Governments aren't supposed to compete for money.

They're supposed to print it.

So what happens when governments start competing for something they can't print?

Check this out.

200,000 Bitcoin every year for five years.

That's the pace required to build America's proposed strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

Most people hear that and think about the price.

They immediately ask,

what happens to Bitcoin? Does it hit a million, five million or ten million? But that might be

the wrong question, because the bigger story is not the price. The bigger story is the signal.

Think about it. For decades, countries competed for gold. They competed for oil. They competed for

trade routes. They competed for strategic resources. And now, for competed for oil, they competed for trade routes, they competed for strategic

resources. And now, for the first time, Bitcoin's entering that conversation. That's why the

strategic Bitcoin Reserve matters, not because it recognizes Bitcoin. That's already happened.

Every other country has to make a decision. Do we acquire Bitcoin, too? Or do we risk having none? That's the game

theory. And game theory is why this story is so important, because the moment one country begins

accumulating Bitcoin, the incentive changes for everyone else, not next decade now. And according to

the White House, an announcement on the strategic Bitcoin Reserve is coming

within weeks. That's why this isn't really a Bitcoin story. It's a nation-state story.

Because there will only ever be 21 million Bitcoin. It's math, right? And once governments start

competing for a fixed supply asset, history suggests they rarely stop at just one buyer. They create followers,

then competitors. Then there's an arms race. And races have a tendency to move much faster than anyone

...