meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
Plodcast

232: Make Politics Political Again

Plodcast

Canon Press

Religion & Spirituality, Christianity

4.81K Ratings

🗓️ 30 March 2022

⏱️ 12 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

Check out Doug's page on Canon Plus: mycanonplus.com/tabs/discover/pages/douglas-wilson

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Welcome to Douglas Wilson's The Plodcast, presented by Canon Press. Yes God, God don't never change.

0:22.1

Welcome to the

0:22.8

the plodcast I'm Douglas Wilson this is episode 232 welcome aboard good to have you

0:29.6

as I'm recording this the hearings for President Biden's Supreme Court nomination,

0:36.5

Katai Brown Jackson, is that it, Are going forward, and she has already delivered us with a quote that will supply us with memes for the ages.

0:50.0

I don't know, you know, when asked what a woman was, she said, I don't know, I'm not a biologist,

0:57.6

which is like saying, is this a dog or a cat?

1:00.3

I don't know, I'm not a veterinarian.

1:08.0

So let's have a little fun for a minute before we get into this. Who's to say what a woman is?

1:10.0

Then what sense did it make for the president to say that he was going to nominate a black woman?

1:17.2

If the follow-up question was, so you are not sure then whether the president fulfilled his promise to nominate a

1:25.1

black woman in nominating you you are unsure whether that was actually actually a

1:30.5

promise that he fulfilled well of, of course, she, what she's doing is she is staying

1:36.6

on the right side of the out-of-control progressive base, which would go nuts.

1:42.0

If she pushed back against the transgender claims, then there

1:48.4

would be an uproar about that and so on. Nobody needs that. The thing I wanted to talk about, and I'm going to get to it, don't worry,

1:56.0

who are your baby jets, is when it comes to Supreme Court nominations, I think that what we've done is we because we have adopted a sort of a

2:07.2

neutralist view of judicial philosophy what matters is the person's legal chops what matters is what their

2:15.0

what their GPA was in law school, what law school it was

2:20.0

and why was it Harvard, you know,

2:22.0

and who did they clerk for what you know is this person a respected legal mind that

2:30.7

sort of that is assumed to be value neutral.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Canon Press, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Canon Press and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.