#202: Trump's Travel Pause & Leaving Big Law
Case in Point: The Legal Show on the Hottest Legal Cases in Politics and Culture
The Heritage Foundation
4.5 • 527 Ratings
🗓️ 28 September 2017
⏱️ 24 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | I'm Elizabeth Slattery and I'm Tiffany Bates. |
| 0:05.5 | And welcome to SCOTUS 101, where we break down what's happening at the Supreme Court, |
| 0:09.1 | what the justices are up to, and other things related to our favorite branch of government. |
| 0:12.8 | This week we're talking about recent grants, the fate of the travel ban case, |
| 0:16.5 | and we'll interview appellate lawyer and former Thomas Clerk, Will Konsevoy. |
| 0:19.9 | The Supreme Court met this week for its long conference, where it considered all of the |
| 0:23.4 | petitions that were filed over the summer. |
| 0:25.4 | Before we get into the details of what the court added to its docket, I'd like to note that |
| 0:29.0 | this week marks the 228th anniversary of the creation of our federal courts. |
| 0:33.3 | The Judiciary Act of 1789 established the federal court system, and the same week, the Senate confirmed our first Chief Justice, John Jay, and five associate |
| 0:41.1 | justices. So happy birthday to the U.S. courts. |
| 0:44.4 | Following its long conference, the Supreme Court announced it will add 11 cases to its schedule, |
| 0:49.1 | including a challenge to public union, public employee union, so-called agency shop arrangements. |
| 0:54.7 | The case is Janice against American Federation. |
| 0:57.5 | By way of background, the court previously granted a very similar case, Friedrichs v. California |
| 1:01.6 | Teachers Association, which asked the justices to overrule a 1970s decision, |
| 1:06.5 | Abood versus Detroit Board of Education. |
| 1:08.9 | In Abood, the court said public employee unions, such as teachers' unions, |
| 1:12.5 | could require employees who opt out of union membership to pay what's known as a fair share |
| 1:16.3 | or agency fee to cover the cost of collective bargaining. But they couldn't be forced to fund |
| 1:22.1 | political expenditures. In the Friedrich's case in 2015, a group of teachers argued that forcing |
| 1:27.4 | them to subsidize the cost of collective bargaining over public employee's salaries and benefits is inherently political and indistinguishable from lobbying. And for that reason, it violates the First Amendment. It was the perfect opportunity for the court to overrule the Abu decision. And in fact, the court had previously called into question the continued |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from The Heritage Foundation, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of The Heritage Foundation and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

