Now, the men's room wants to know

Who sucks?

Yay, time for Who Sucks Lies.

See the throw hole you bring us three stories from the news every week now.

So it's up to us in a tournament.

Out of these three stories, which one sucks the least?

Now, if you have to follow KISW on Facebook and Twitter, the debate is already underway on Who Sucks Lies.

Yes, indeed.

Like I said, we have, you know, you said three stories.

Two of these will deal with what I call bad parenting.

I think you'll agree.

And one of them is just no rest for the wicked as it were.

So let us start in England where an innocent man who served 17 years behind bars for a rape that he did not commit.

He may now have to pay thousands of dollars to the prison for board and lodgings.

So 57 year old Andrew Malkin said he was found guilty of raping a woman in 2003.

The following year, he was jailed for life with a minimum term of seven years and he served 10 more years behind bars

because he maintained his innocence.

So Mr. Malkin says conviction,

Internet of getting squashed after DNA evidence leaked another man to the crime that he was accused.

However, he has now revealed that he may have to pay for the cost of food and accommodation, if you want to call that, while he was behind bars.

It's understood that this has been a standard practice in a miscarriage of justice cases since the Criminal Appeal Act of 1995.

Basically, that came into force.

...