I'm John Bachelor with Bill Rajo, my colleague and co-host and we're very much enjoying the remarks by David Dayoud sensible fix to the war of the north, the

potential of the war of the north, Hezbollah attacking Israel.

Hezbollah is a direct surrogate of the Islamic Republic of Iran and that is a fundamental fact.

So when I read a headline in the times of Israel saying Iran liable to join fight if Israel takes on Hezbollah.

That is ironic, but nevertheless I go to the report from the US side.

The top US military officer warned go to the report from the US side.

The top US military officer warned,

this is chairman of the United States joint chiefs of staff,

Air Force General Charles Brown warned that any Israeli

military offensive in the Lebanon would risk an Iranian response in defense of

the powerful Hezbollah terror group and that US forces would be challenged to bolster Israel's

air defense umbrella pointing to the episode where Iran sent a barrage over

Israel and most everything was intercepted.

David at this point I bypassed the irony liable to get involved, is deeply involved.

What is Hezbollah need from Iran that they're not now using? What would the difference be? Thank you, David.

We could see a whole array of weapons used by the Iranians that we haven't seen so far, including what I think it was on April 13th with the Iranians didn't deploy them.

Something similar we could also see is what we saw in Syria, that it's not just

Hezbollah going to fight. I mean you made an excellent point that Iran has been part of

this war from the outset even if Pacific battalions have not, you know, been activated.

That's like saying the US Marines are invading Tripoli, but the United States

will later get into the war.

Iran has been involved in the war by Hezbollah firing abroad.

...