Good news, bad news.

All right, you always start with bad, unless you really wanted me to say good, in which case, start with the good news.

No, we're going to start with good news because bad news might take a while.

Okay, let's start with the good.

You always do good news first.

Always do good news.

Good news.

Yes.

I moved my second jab again.

So it's now even earlier.

So I will be getting my second shot in like just under three weeks now.

Oh, excellent.

So I will be on the eight week gap, which is the typical gap here.

However, it is possible to get it done before, and I may get it done before, because

there are a bunch of, like, pop-up clinics and stuff that appear all over London, but my, I have

a booking for, like, three weeks from now. Excellent. Now, I'm not trying to be funny. I'm not

trying to, like, be a turd or anything. Is that, is moving it up the right answer? Because I did mine, I believe, a month or, you know, four weeks between one shot and two. But I thought I had heard some very tentative science saying that you guys were actually doing it right and waiting longer was arguably better. Do you know anything about this?

My understanding from what like public health England is saying and stuff is eight weeks is like what they consider to be the sweet spot. Okay. There are, there's also studies in other places that

suggest six is good, but some gap seems to be suggested is a benefit.

It seems like a lot of people in America just couldn't have done super quick.

I don't think it's necessarily, from what I've seen, it's not bad to do it that way,

but you can get, you know, a few more percentage points of immunity by waiting a little bit longer.

...