I'm against nuclear power because I care about my children. But maybe then I should be for it.

Because they'll need energy too and fossil fuels in 50 years time there won't be any left.

There are renewable energies but will that be enough? In the meantime with them there's no waste but nuclear power. That said the quantity of

really radioactive waste isn't that big a thimble per year per person

multiplied by the number of people that's a pretty big thimble. There are solutions,

although storing them.

But at least then we know where they are because the CO2 produced by oil and coal

hello greenhouse effect.

On the other hand, there's the risk with the power plants,

although in matters of safety there's no place more safe.

In the end, nuclear energy is a source of problems, and at the same time it's a source of

solutions.

And you, are you for or against nuclear energy? America.

It's a pellet size that it might, the tip of my pinky,

and it contains as much energy as a ton of coal, 147 gallons of crude oil or 17,000 cubic feet of natural gas.

Okay guys, welcome back to the Grimerica show. We're going to be chatting nuclear with

atomic rod atoms a little bit later, But first, as always, I was too scared to take the shot done off.

Hey buddy, how's it going? Good. Yeah we got atomic rod here who people that listen to no agenda which some of them do will know

atomic rod from from there he he gets in touch with Adam Curry and puts some common sense into the

mainstream media fear porn that we hear. Anti-nuclear propaganda, Petro-fueled anti-nuclear Propagana, Petro-Feeled Anti-nuclear Propaganda?

Yeah, that's kind of what it's like, yeah.

So yeah, a very interesting chat with Rod and that Darren was making a little reference to me going on a little overnight camping trip and being scared.

...