This is Adria from Oceanside, California, and you are listening to California

on orbital jigsaw network.

Okay, Dreamers, it is Friday morning and I am trying to get this out to you

as soon as possible. So hopefully it will be by the end of today.

This is the second part of our two-part series entitled The Tale of Writing Our Wrongs.

If you have not yet listened to Part 1,

pause this here and listen to episode 1.

First, so you can be up to speed with where we're at.

In part one, we went over the circumstances surrounding the March 10th, 1983 murder of Suburban

Wife and Mother, Dora Lisker.

She and her husband of 36 years, Bob, at the time they had a 17-year-old adopted son, Bruce, who quickly became the focal point of the investigation.

Because of his history of substance abuse and troubles getting along with his parents, Bruce appeared to be a likely suspect.

All the investigator on the case needed to do was prove it.

But would he be able to? Was the evidence there enough to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Bruce was the killer?

Were other suspects thoroughly investigated and eliminated.

Let's get into the remainder of the story and see if we can answer these questions.

We left off with Bruce and his dad coming to the decision that their best course of action might be to just

go ahead and plead guilty in juvenile court.

That way, Bruce would be able to serve a minimal amount of time and be home in just a matter of about five years or so.

Ultimately, their goal for both Bruce and Bob would be for Bob to live long enough to see Bruce free again someday.

While Bruce was awaiting trial, something else happened.

He was visited by a battery of psychologists in order for them to have a chance to speak to him and make a determination as to what would be the best direction to go in dealing with

...