Hey everyone. Both David Swenson and I contacted each other shortly after the election

results were known on Tuesday night and said we've got to do a program. And what we're trying to do in this

program is not tell you how we feel about this necessarily.

I think we're trying to sort it out a little bit and to find some sort of clarification about what it means, what it portends, where it comes from.

And my biggest desire, David, is to legitimize the election and to legitimize the rage, even though I find some of the rage

bewildering and as I say many times in this talk I don't think that Trump was

the best possible embodiment of that rage but But I want it, I want to say that this is how

America works. Sometimes the people get all worked up and they want to make their frustration known in the profoundest possible way and they

have done it.

Yeah, we, there was so much that I had hoped we could talk about and that we didn't get to and it was we started this

because of a post on fans of Thomas Jefferson hour on their Facebook page

like many.

Steve Skervyn asked that we do a show on this,

and he said, I'm looking to the Thomas Jefferson Hour

for Hope, which is flattering in itself.

It is. And I wrote about this you can go to Facebook or go to

Clay Jenkins.com. I have a post. David I'm sent I guess you probably disagree

with one part of it. I do believe that this was this election was a very severe

vote of no confidence for Hillary Clinton. Yeah you know I do I took we didn't talk

about that in the show but I really took issue with your column about that.

You are such a cautious wordsmith and you're so careful about and clear about how you write.

And you know I noticed that you didn't say as you did in the

...