Last month, I replied to Andrew Wilson's criticisms of me that he made on the Patrick Bet

David show. And the responses from him and some of the other people I criticized in that

episode ranged from the unusual to the unhinged. So in today's episode, I'm going to go through

those responses and restate why I consider this issue so important and not just something we can

agree to disagree about.

All right, so to give you a little context, Andrew Wilson said I and Lila Rose belong to a group he calls

sewing circle Christians who care more about appeasing liberals by criticizing Christians who swear, for example,

instead of uniting with those Christians to combat degenerates.

But I never see him surrounded with a panel of like the worst degenerates on earth

debating all of their worldview simultaneously, but they have tons of criticisms for people who do.

But that's not my position.

As I made clear in my response to Andrew, I'm all in favor of doing whatever it takes to combat

error and evil, except for using

sinful methods like verbally abusing people. And to make sure I didn't misunderstand Andrew, I sent

him the script for my episode ahead of time, and I incorporated almost all his replies into the final

episode. So I was baffled when I saw him post on X afterwards that he considered my response fundamentally dishonest.

However, Andrew's response paled in comparison to others, especially Jay Dyer.

In one part of my episode, I criticized Dyer for calling Talbert Swan Tilda Swinton.

He wasn't being abusive, but it is annoying and silly for someone who wants to publicly defend the Christian faith on a large platform.

But then Dyer said on X, Trent Horn virtue signals over me calling a fake black activist bishop a fake bishop.

But I didn't say that. This is either a lie or an ignorant falsehood.

So I told Jay, I accurately pointed out your

...