Recently, Redeem Zumer made a video about 14 alleged contradictions in the historical teachings of the Catholic Church.

So in today's episode, we're going to go through them and view them in light of what I consider to be

Redeemed Zumers' two main arguments against Catholicism.

But before I do that, I want to say two things.

First, I want to give a big thanks to Redeem Zer, or RZ, from here on out, who reviewed this script to make sure that I understood his arguments before offering my reply.

And second, I want to address a gut feeling some Protestants have when they see rebuttals like this one put out online.

I feel like some of them have this train of thought.

Wow, it took 10 Catholic apologists to

respond to some guy who likes Minecraft. They're in total panic damage control mode. If that's what

Catholics have to do, then this really shows how flimsy their position is. The fact that many

Catholic apologists might respond to a Redeemed Zumer video or a Gavin Ortland video does not mean

those videos are a silver bullet against Catholicism.

A dozen Christian apologists might respond to an Alex O'Connor video.

But Protestants agree it's annoying when atheists say that the mere number of Christian apologists responding to an atheist means that Christian apologists are in some kind of panicked damage control mode.

I've created videos that multiple Protestant apologists have responded to,

but I would never want Catholics to triumphally say this fact alone proves I've refuted Protestantism.

These kinds of videos only show that someone created content that has gotten a lot of views,

and so it will be prudent to

respond to the errors or alleged errors in that content. That's all. On the other hand,

I've noticed some Catholics say that RZ is acting in bad faith, because he recently said

that Catholic arguments are bad or super weak, or that Catholic apologists engage in sophisticated

cope. But many Catholics think the same

...