4.8 • 4.4K Ratings
🗓️ 27 July 2020
⏱️ 91 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Despite occasional and important disagreements, most people are in rough agreement about what it means to be moral, to do the right thing. There’s much less agreement about why we should be moral, or even what kind of answer to that question could be convincing. Philosopher Russ Shafer-Landau is one of the leading proponents of moral realism — the view that objective moral truths exist independently of human choices. That’s not my own view, but ethics and meta-ethics are areas in which I think it’s wise to keep an open mind and listen to smart people who disagree. This conversation offers food for thought for people on either side of this debate.
Support Mindscape on Patreon.
Russ Shafer-Landau received his Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Arizona. He is currently Professor of Philosophy at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. Among his numerous books are Moral Realism: A Defense and Whatever Happened to Good and Evil? He is the editor of Oxford Studies in Metaethics, and is the founder and organizer of the annual Madison Metaethics Workshop.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Hello everyone and welcome to the Mindscape Podcast. I'm your host Sean Carroll. I think |
0:04.8 | that many of us are interested in trying to do the right thing in various contexts, |
0:10.3 | but as we learn from Spike Lee's movie, as well as elsewhere, it can be hard to know |
0:14.1 | what it means to do the right thing. And that's true both in a narrow sense and in a meta |
0:19.4 | sense. In a literal sense, we don't know which thing to do is the right one. That's |
0:24.9 | what Spike Lee investigated, but the meta sense is what does it mean to say that something |
0:31.1 | is the right thing? So there literally is within philosophy, the study of ethics, a moral |
0:37.2 | philosophy, but then there's a study of meta ethics. What are the standards by which |
0:42.1 | we defend a certain conception of what is morally right? I myself subscribe to something |
0:47.4 | called moral constructivism, where I think that what exists out there in the world is |
0:52.4 | the natural world, stuff, behaving in certain ways, and accordance with the laws of physics. |
0:58.7 | Morality I think is something that we human beings, or presumably other conscious creatures, |
1:03.3 | out there in the cosmos, talk about and construct ourselves. And then it's very interesting |
1:08.5 | to talk about, well, what things should we construct? How should we decide to be moral |
1:13.5 | in different people disagree and so forth? But I think that my point of view there is |
1:17.5 | a minority one. I think it most people, both on the street and professional thinkers about |
1:23.0 | this, are what we call moral realists. They think that in addition to the physical stuff |
1:28.6 | of the universe, there is something else, some way of judging what is right and wrong. |
1:33.6 | It might come from God, if you're religious, or it might come from philosophizing, from |
1:38.6 | pure rationality, or it might just come from sort of introspecting about our intuitions |
1:44.2 | about what is right and what is wrong. So today's guest is Russ Schaeffer Landau. He's |
1:48.9 | one of the best people to talk about these issues. He's one of the leading defenders of |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Sean Carroll | Wondery, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Sean Carroll | Wondery and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.