4.8 • 4.4K Ratings
🗓️ 20 July 2020
⏱️ 86 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Someday, most likely, we will encounter life that is not as we know it. We might find it elsewhere in the universe, we might find it right here on Earth, or we might make it ourselves in a lab. Will we know it when we see it? “Life” isn’t a simple unified concept, but rather a collection of a number of life-like properties. I talk with astrobiologist Stuart Bartlett, who (in collaboration with Michael Wong) has proposed a new way of thinking about life based on four pillars: dissipation, autocatalysis, homeostasis, and learning. Their framework may or may not become the standard picture, but it provides a useful way of thinking about what we expect life to be.
Support Mindscape on Patreon.
Stuart Bartlett received his Ph.D. in complex systems from the University of Southampton. He is currently a postdoctoral researcher in the Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences at Caltech, and was formerly a postdoc at the Earth Life Science Institute at the Tokyo Institute of Technology.
See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
0:00.0 | Hello everyone, welcome to the Mindscape Podcast. I'm your host Sean Carroll. |
0:04.0 | You might have noticed that we've talked a lot in the podcast about life, about the scientific |
0:09.3 | concept of life, especially in the context of possible kinds of life elsewhere, not here |
0:15.7 | right on Earth or at least not naturally occurring right here on Earth. We talked to Kate |
0:19.6 | Adamala about synthetic life, about actually building living organisms in the laboratory. |
0:25.0 | We talked to Sarah Marie Walker about information and what that has to do with life, how |
0:30.8 | living beings use information, but also how information helps us define what it means to a living being, |
0:36.0 | to be a living being. And we talked to Kevin Hand about actually looking for life elsewhere here |
0:40.8 | in the solar system. In all of these discussions, we've mentioned the fact that we don't have a once |
0:47.0 | and for all definition of what life actually is, but we sort of mentioned that, mumble about it, |
0:52.8 | then moved on to something else. So let's take the opportunity to actually dig in. Today's |
0:58.7 | guest is Stuart Bartlett, who's a researcher here at Caltech at my own university, and he's an |
1:04.0 | expert in what life actually means, what the word life means. He and his collaborator Michael |
1:09.6 | Wong recently published a paper that actually goes through all of the different features of what |
1:15.6 | come into being a living being, and make the point that some of these features might not exist |
1:21.3 | in every single thing you want to call life. So they actually define some new words, and they |
1:26.4 | hypothesize about which of these features, such as learning and homeostasis, would come first, |
1:33.0 | which are more important than which would come later. And the answer is, you know, we don't know. |
1:37.9 | It's a very, it's a wonderful little organizational tool to remind us of how much work there is to be |
1:43.8 | done, to really understand what it means to undergo a transition from simply some complex chemical |
1:50.3 | reaction to something we would actually call life. And it harkens back to the various talks that |
1:56.0 | we've had, you know, information plays a huge role here. The possibilities of building life in |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Sean Carroll | Wondery, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Sean Carroll | Wondery and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2025.