Hello, Anna Richardson here. I just thought I'd leave you a quick voice note to tell you

about my new advice podcast. It can't just be me.

I'll be getting super honest about my own topsy-turvy life, as well as helping you solve your

life dilemmas with the support of some very special guests and experts. From Podimo

and Max created, it can't just be me, wherever you get your podcasts.

I've never heard it described that way, and I know a lot of our listeners are curious about

that's why we're asking these questions. But the fact that you've got to make sure that

the defense attorney is doing his job, because that brings up his clients' claim afterwards

of ineffective counsel, if he doesn't do his job correctly, then you have to go through the

whole damn thing again. Yeah, I mean, there's no sense in doing that. Not if you can prompt

them to do something that hadn't been done. I mean, you know, it just makes sense to do that.

Otherwise, you're just doing it for no reason. You're just going to come back and do it again.

What's the rule 32? It's a post-conviction remedy that a defendant has where he can

raise issues like ineffective assistance of counsel. If the facts are on his side, he can get

a new trial. He can get a conviction set aside. So now, in Alabama, do you have

discoveries at trial by ambush? No, it's discovery. Again, just like we do as far as giving

notice to defense lawyers about when their cases are going to be tried, we try our best on

getting our discovery out as quickly as we can. Again, because it does mean no good for

defense lawyers not to have their discovery. I mean, they can't advise their client or discuss

with their client what they think they should do if they can't fully appreciate a case. So,

I mean, we certainly, you know, there's times when we may be slow about it or we may miss something,

but by and large, I feel like we do a good job of getting what we're supposed to get to the

...