meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The DSR Network

100% Guaranteed No Trump Episode

The DSR Network

Chris Cotnoir

Government

4.51.9K Ratings

🗓️ 26 October 2017

⏱️ 37 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

It seems impossible, but on this episode of Deep State Radio, our indomitable team of Kori Schake of Stanford, Rosa Brooks of Georgetown, Ed Luce of the Financial Times and host, David Rothkopf, of the nearest pizzeria, manage to have an entire conversation without mentioning the president of the Untied States. Well, ok, that's a lie. But he's never really the subject of a conversation that focuses on eternal verities, great literature, big ideas and why the foreign policy community hasn't had one in so long. Tune in, nerds. You'll learn something!Support this show http://supporter.acast.com/deepstateradio. See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Love this podcast.

0:02.0

Support this show through the A-Cast supporter feature.

0:05.0

It's up to you how much you give,

0:07.0

and there's no regular commitment.

0:09.0

Just click the link in the show description to support now. 9. 12. 28. 10 28 to 23.

0:27.0

23.

0:30.0

This is Deep State Radio.

0:33.0

Coming to you direct from our super secret studio in the third sub-basement of the Ministry of

0:39.3

Snark in Washington, D.C. and from other undisclosed locations across America and around the world.

0:47.0

Hello and welcome to another episode of Deep State Radio. I am David Rothkoff. I am coming to you today from New York City. In London, England,

0:56.0

we have Corey Schake, and in our studio in the third sub-basement of the Ministry of Snark, we have the Financial Times Ed Luce and Roseabrooks of Georgetown

1:06.1

University. Our last episode ended up with a lively discussion, as those things are, of Britishisms.

1:17.0

And Rosa, you seemed like you had one that you wanted to share with everybody.

1:22.0

I do. I have one that confuses me a little bit and for years I have

1:26.3

wondered about this the phrase I was a bit chuffed because it seems to me that it's used in two opposite ways.

1:33.7

Sometimes it's used to imply, you know, rather please,

1:37.2

and other times it's used to imply rather put out.

1:39.7

So am I wrong about that, Ed?

1:41.2

And can you please explain the phrase a bit chuffed about that?

1:47.0

If you're chuffed, I always take it to mean you're happy, you're quite pleased.

1:50.6

I never take it to mean the opposite.

1:52.6

It's not an ambivalent.

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Chris Cotnoir, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Chris Cotnoir and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.