You're listening to Plenary Session.

On this bonus episode of Plenary Session, I'm back in Plenary Session H.Q with Palmer Green,

and he is the author of a new paper out on JGIM.

It's called Should Evidence Come with an Expiration date. You won't want to miss this bonus episode.

But first, a plug. If you like this episode and you like this podcast, I need you to do three things.

One, go to patreon.com and back this podcast.

Backing an artist you support on patreon.com is a great way to keep something going.

Next, go to the iTunes store and don't just give us five stars.

Write a review.

Tell us what you like about the podcast and what you don't like.

A written review goes a long way.

Third, recommend plenary session to a friend. If you have a friend, a colleague, someone you think is going to like this podcast, give them a recommendation. We can use it on plenary session.

Now, what can plenary session do for you? Well, we can answer your questions. Tweet to us at plenary underscore session or send us an email at plenary session podcast at gmail.com.

We like listener comments and questions and we're happy to talk about them on the next episode.

I'm back here in plenary session HQ with Dr. Palmer. Palmer Green. Oh, soon to be Dr. Palmer Green, because Palmer Green is a fourth-year medical student at the University of Chicago-Pritzger School of Medicine. He did his undergraduate degree at Columbia University, and he's an aspiring neurologist. And he's here to talk about a paper in the Journal of General, Internal Medicine,

that paper is called Should Evidence Come With an Expiration Date?

It's by Palmer, myself, and Dr. Adams-Gifu of the University of Chicago,

and it is about medical evidence and whether or not it needs to have an expire-by date.

Palmer, thanks so much for joining us here in Plenary Session.

Thank you, Dr. Prasad. It's great to be on the podcast.

You've listened to all of these episodes, I'm sure.

I've listened to a handful.

...