City of London, Lai Romanov.

You may be surprised to learn that the city of London

and the city of London are two very different things.

Related to each other mostly by historical accident

and geographical proximity and coexisting today in a rather complicated power system in which the city of London appears gloriously victorious.

First, the city of London, I'll keep the map up here, so people can see it, first the city of London, I'll keep the map up here, so people can see it.

First, the city of London, a small area of about one square mile in size was established as a haven

by the Kazar Jews during their extermination from Kazaria nearly 1,000 years ago and was named London at the time.

And yes, I know the Romans had been there first.

The city of London, with the bridge and Harroids and the fish and ships and the people

driving on the wrong side of the road road was established much later, adopted the same name and gradually expanded with population until it completely surrounded the Jewish enclave of the city of London.

You can see the positions and relative sizes from the map.

When you read about the Lord Mayor of London, you are not reading about the chief executive of the city,

but about the chief executive of the city.

The city of London Corporation, with a square mile directly in the center of London, obviously owns some very expensive real estate.

This in addition to a great deal of other property also in the city center.

But this amounts to only perhaps $10 in total and as we will see is trivial

The city of London is effectively an independent city state existing inside greater London

However, its nature is unique and complicated.

It is not so neat and tidy as is the Vatican,

for example, which is clearly a separate sovereign entity

nestled within the city of Rome.

...