Welcome to Zero. I'm Akshutrati.

This week, choices, controversies and carbon footprints.

There are plenty of controversial things about climate change.

That it is not happening is not one of them.

The science is clear.

Humans burning fossil fuels is the primary reason behind heating the planet.

And cutting those emissions to zero will stop the rise in global average temperature.

Where the legitimate controversies lie is on how we get to zero.

That's because there isn't one solution or even one set of solutions

that will help achieve that goal in every country on the planet.

There's plenty of good debate to be had about why one solution is better than the other

and what are the best ways to deploy those solutions.

There are also legitimate concerns around who should be responsible for those solutions,

corporations, governments or individuals.

Today we are going to delve into understanding the agency that individuals have to affect change.

While it's clear there's no way to get to zero without systemic changes,

it's also true that there's a growing role that individuals can play as consumers or as agents of systemic changes.

However, often the conversation around individual action on climate starts off on a

controversial metric, carbon footprints.

The very idea of any individual feeling accountable to this is something that the oil

companies who are far more accountable would like you to believe.

It's a proxy for talking about blame.

...