Why We Should Abolish Hate Speech Laws - Andrew Doyle
TRIGGERnometry
Konstantin Kisin & Francis Foster
4.5 • 3.4K Ratings
🗓️ 12 April 2024
⏱️ 10 minutes
🧾️ Download transcript
Summary
Transcript
Click on a timestamp to play from that location
| 0:00.0 | This episode is brought to you by Revolute. Revolute is the all-in-one finance app for those who want more from their money. |
| 0:07.0 | Like security features, including one-off card details that can change with each purchase, |
| 0:11.0 | instantly freezing and unfreezing a mislaid card, or using data to identify |
| 0:15.8 | suspicious transactions. Revolute, the future of money is here. |
| 0:20.4 | Sign up at Revolute.com slash podcast reward and receive 20 pounds when you make your first purchase with Revolute. |
| 0:26.4 | 18 plus until the 14th of April 2024, Ties and C supply. |
| 0:31.3 | Since when did it become the business of the state to audit our emotions. |
| 0:35.0 | In effect, this is precisely what's happening by means of the various hate speech laws that have been implemented throughout Europe in recent years. |
| 0:42.0 | In Ireland, the imminent criminal justice bill |
| 0:45.4 | would represent one of the most draconian forms of hate speech legislation |
| 0:49.4 | yet produced. |
| 0:50.4 | And how is hatred defined in the bill? |
| 0:53.0 | Well, the following is a direct quotation. |
| 0:55.0 | Hatred means hatred against a person or a group of persons in the state or elsewhere |
| 1:01.0 | on account of their protected characteristics or any one of those characteristics. |
| 1:05.2 | So hatred means hatred. Glad we cleared that up. |
| 1:08.6 | This kind of circular definition is what we've come to expect from legislators when it comes to this most nebulous of |
| 1:14.0 | concept. In his book, censored, Paul Coleman helpfully includes all of the existing legislation |
| 1:19.7 | on hatred from across Europe, and in doing so he reveals that no two governments are able to agree on its meaning. |
| 1:26.0 | In 2012, the European Court of Human Rights concluded that there is no universally accepted definition of the expression hate speech, |
| 1:34.4 | and a manual published by UNESCO in 2015 accepted |
| 1:37.6 | that the possibility of reaching a universally shared definition seems unlikely. |
... |
Please login to see the full transcript.
Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Konstantin Kisin & Francis Foster, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.
Generated transcripts are the property of Konstantin Kisin & Francis Foster and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.
Copyright © Tapesearch 2026.

