meta_pixel
Tapesearch Logo
Log in
The Emerald

Who Gets To Claim Objective Reality? An Imaginative Dive Into Cultural Fictions Along the Science-Spirit Divide

The Emerald

Joshua Schrei

Religion & Spirituality, Trance, Mythology, Culture, Society & Culture, Shamanism, Arts, Justice, Entheogens, Spirituality, Cosmology, Art, History

4.8 β€’ 853 Ratings

πŸ—“οΈ 9 July 2019

⏱️ 33 minutes

🧾️ Download transcript

Summary

"I mean seriously, what's more out of touch with objective reality? The Lakota sense of Wakan-tanka, mother and father nature, mirrored in cultures and traditions around the globe. Or, say... Wal-Mart?"Who gets to claim objective reality? Scientists, leftists, rightists, capitalists, religious types, the spiritual-but-not-religious, atheists, modernists and ancients alike have all tried. Ultimately it may be that the only thing that can lay claim to objective reality is mystery itself. In thi...

Transcript

Click on a timestamp to play from that location

0:00.0

Hi everyone. I'm Josh, and this is The Emerald,

0:10.2

currents and trends through a mythic lens. The podcast where we explore an ever-changing world

0:16.6

and our lives in it through the lens of myth, story, and imagination.

0:26.8

The Emerald.

0:28.6

All that's happening on this green jewel in space. So I want to start today by reading a part of a wonderful interview that David Marchezy of the New York Times magazine had with late show host Stephen Colbert, who happens to be both my favorite news source and my favorite fellow

0:55.9

Tolkien nerd. Colbert is also a practicing Catholic, kind of an anomaly in the liberal

1:01.7

entertainment world, and Marchesey had the courage to ask him very sincerely about faith and how it

1:08.0

fits into the liberal worldview and into modern 21st century politics.

1:13.2

So Marchese says, I want to ask you what's probably a naive question about faith, but I promise

1:19.4

that it's sincere, and it's about something I'm hoping you can help me with. This is related to the

1:24.6

idea of how belief in nationalism is ultimately about the feeling and comfort that idea gives people, and maybe not so much about objective facts, which is to say it's about a kind of faith.

1:37.1

But, and I think this is part of what I've always stumbled over with religion, why is it that we might accept a form of belief that perhaps doesn't jive

1:45.1

with objective reality as being fundamentally problematic and socially detrimental, while another

1:50.9

one, religious belief, we're supposed to understand is okay. Can parallels be drawn there? And here's

1:57.2

Colbert's response. That's interesting. That's a really big question.

2:01.7

I think you're describing two different things.

2:03.9

Everyone approaches their own faith in their own way,

2:06.1

so you might be describing an exact parallel between someone's faith and our present political moment.

2:12.1

There might be no difference to some people.

2:14.6

To me, there's a difference because in the red meat that gets thrown out in many

2:18.7

political rallies, not just this president's, you're indulging the audience's appetite. That's

2:24.6

not the same thing as appealing to their principles. To indulge the audience's appetite is what my old

...

Please login to see the full transcript.

Disclaimer: The podcast and artwork embedded on this page are from Joshua Schrei, and are the property of its owner and not affiliated with or endorsed by Tapesearch.

Generated transcripts are the property of Joshua Schrei and are distributed freely under the Fair Use doctrine. Transcripts generated by Tapesearch are not guaranteed to be accurate.

Copyright Β© Tapesearch 2025.